Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Ken.C #215679 07/19/08 03:22 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I'm still trying to absorb this...?$^$^$^$^


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
SirQuack #215680 07/19/08 03:25 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Sorry, it's one of those aha! things. I'm not sure if I can explain properly. But each amp will not be providing more than 60 watts maximum to each driver section, right? So it's not additive.

Last edited by kcarlile; 07/19/08 03:25 AM.

I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Ken.C #215682 07/19/08 03:28 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
That's right Ken, it is no difference in power if one were to leave the binding post straps in place. Both ways each section is still only going to get 60 watts max .


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215686 07/19/08 04:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
If I remember right Mojo had a hard time with the Bi-amp theory as well. Now if I remember right, when you bridge the amps you can add their wattage.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215689 07/19/08 04:54 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Rick, you're probably referring to our discussion of bridging that took place about three years ago here , and especially to secs. 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 of the linked article.

Slack, I wasn't going to bother discussing the point since you seemed to have lost interest in bridging(which in contrast to the form of "biamping" that you're discussing actually does increase the power available to the speaker), but you might read the sections of the article mentioned. The short version is that the impedance of a speaker can't change(e.g., from 6 to 3 ohms)when the amplifier driving it is bridged, but the amplifier is putting double the voltage(theoretically)into the speaker, and because of Ohm's Law(I=E/R), when the voltage is doubled so is the current, with impedance staying the same. So, the amplifier has to put out more current because of the increased voltage, but this has nothing to do with the impedance of the speaker. The amplifier doesn't "see" a lowered speaker impedance because it can't see something that isn't there.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
JohnK #215698 07/19/08 01:29 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833

That's it, thanks John.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215702 07/19/08 02:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
S
slack Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
S
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
hmm, ok, there's two things thats confusing me.

FIrst, By biamping, the mid+high will get 60w dedicated. The woofer also gets 60W dedicated. That does not add up to 120W? I'm not quite sure i get it... Unless you're talking about the mid+high and woofer playing in different parts of the freq spectrum, and the mid+high is getting the top half of 60W, the woofer is getting the lower half of 60W, in the end there is stil only 60W into the speaker?

Second, bridging uses one channel for pull, and the other channel for push. As the speaker impedance remains same, with voltage doubled by using the two channels in bridge, the current, hence power should ideally double, and it does with a beefy amp. I have read articles that describe this as each channel now 'seeing' only half of the speaker impedance, hence current doubled. Not too sure how pushing the amp limits with higher current affects how 'controlled' the bass sounds, but i could hear a difference....(EDIT: ok, just read the article linked in above post, describing the amp as seeing half the impedance is just an analogy. I understand that the speaker impedance remains the same, but the higher current strains the amp and drives distortion up)

Still need help with the bi-amping part though : )

Last edited by slack; 07/19/08 02:36 PM. Reason: moderation
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #215704 07/19/08 02:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833

When you use passive bi amping, like you are, each section of the speaker is capable of receiving 60 watts max. The lower half and upper half cannot be added together as neither section is receiving 120 watts, the are still only getting they same 60 watts.

Now, if you were to leave the binding strap's in place and use only one of the amps both section are capable of receiving the same 60 watts max. Once again the upper 60 watts and the lower 60 watts are not to be added together as 120 watts.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215705 07/19/08 03:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
S
slack Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
S
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
 Originally Posted By: wid

When you use passive bi amping, like you are, each section of the speaker is capable of receiving 60 watts max. The lower half and upper half cannot be added together as neither section is receiving 120 watts, the are still only getting they same 60 watts.


So assuming the mid+high is drawing the max 60W from one channel, and the woofer is also drawing the max 60W from the other channel, isn't there 120W of total music power coming out of the floorstander? 60W of mid+high energy from its dedicated channel, and another 60W of bass energy from the other dedicated channel.

If the straps were left in place and the floorstander is driven with only one channel of 60W, assuming a 50/50 split then the woofer gets 30w and the mid+high gets 30w.

In any case, what is the benefit of bi-amping? The ability to pla y twice as loud (120w total music power) vs 60W, or playing with less distortion at the same level as each channel is only at half power.

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #215706 07/19/08 03:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
You could buy the Axiom M60s instead, thereby avoiding the M80's amplification conundrum.


LIFE: "Choices, balance, and timing"

(Larryism)
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 485 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4