Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #215707 07/19/08 03:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
 Quote:
So assuming the mid+high is drawing the max 60W from one channel, and the woofer is also drawing the max 60W from the other channel, isn't there 120W of total music power coming out of the floorstander? 60W of mid+high energy from its dedicated channel, and another 60W of bass energy from the other dedicated channel.


No this is not correct. As said before the two sections cannot be added to together as neither section is receiving the perceived 120 watts.

 Quote:
If the straps were left in place and the floorstander is driven with only one channel of 60W, assuming a 50/50 split then the woofer gets 30w and the mid+high gets 30w.


This is also not true. As the 60 watts cannot be combined the same goes for dividing the 60 watts. The binding strap are an electrical conduit just as speaker wires are. They will transfer the power to both sections the same as when you are bi amping or bi wiring.

 Quote:
In any case, what is the benefit of bi-amping? The ability to pla y twice as loud (120w total music power) vs 60W, or playing with less distortion at the same level as each channel is only at half power.


There are no benefits to passive bi amping. To achieve the ability to play twice as loud you need to have TEN times the power......600 watts.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215708 07/19/08 03:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
'Yo Wid ... have my man Slack check out this article, it should help him understand the theory behind bi-amping a little easier.

Bi-Amping

Go ahead, you can use the link Ricky. \:D \:D


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
RickF #215710 07/19/08 04:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833

Good linky Ricky .


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
Wid #215712 07/19/08 04:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
We aim to please, big fella.

\:D


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
RickF #216274 07/25/08 03:03 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
S
slack Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
S
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
I think I'm beginning to get it, sorry for the frustration to you guys..*sheepish grin*. Thanks!

If i have the option now to buy a used Parasound HCA-806 to replace the two rotels, i guess it is not considered much of an upgrade in terms of power.

How about the sound quality, build quality and tonal characteristic of the Parasound compare with the Rotel amp?

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #216275 07/25/08 03:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Amps are about power slack, not sound quality and tonal characteristics, they amplify. Build quality is another topic, which I can't comment as I don't own either brands.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
SirQuack #216301 07/25/08 12:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
S
slack Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
S
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 28
Yeah, but i'm sure every one has experienced power amps that sound different, for one reason or another..: ))

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #216316 07/25/08 03:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 274
local
Offline
local
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 274
Those reasons mostly being slight differences in volume setting.

Re: Rotel RB-960BX for M80 - enough power?
slack #216389 07/26/08 02:41 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Slack, if an amplifier has a "tonal characteristic" when its controls are set flat, there's something wrong with it. It's either a damaged sample, incompetently designed, or intentionally designed not to be sonically accurate and impress those who might equate different with better. An amplifier isn't a musical instrument and its only function should be to amplify transparently, with audibly flat frequency response and inaudibly low noise and distortion within its designed power limits. Nothing more is possible. One of the great features of today's audio scene is that even modestly priced receivers can accomplish this.

Certainly a contrary view exists, but when put to the(controlled blind listening)test it collapses because of the lack of solid evidence to support it. Both of the units that you mention meet the standard for transparent amplification.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 353 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4