Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
ToriLia #219938 09/05/08 02:41 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Tori, there's been no informed comment that the Yamahas have any problem with Axioms. Both the 2808 and 663 would give you transparent amplification within their nearly identical power limits. Again choose on the basis of features and price. Note for example that the 2808 has the Audyssey MultEq XT setup and equalization system while the 663 uses the YPAO; many consider the Audyssey to be more advanced at this stage of development.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Receiver opinion needed.
JohnK #219943 09/05/08 03:54 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
 Originally Posted By: JohnK
Tori, there's been no informed comment that the Yamahas have any problem with Axioms. Both the 2808 and 663 would give you transparent amplification within their nearly identical power limits. Again choose on the basis of features and price. Note for example that the 2808 has the Audyssey MultEq XT setup and equalization system while the 663 uses the YPAO; many consider the Audyssey to be more advanced at this stage of development.


AutoEQ is for chumps. Real men "play it by ear".


M80s/VP160/QS8s/EP350; M22s; M3s.
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
doormat #220093 09/06/08 12:56 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
T
ToriLia Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
T
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Thanks again for all the advice everyone.

After looking around some more, I'm now leaning towards getting the DSP-AX763 (US RX-V663 I think...).

The main reasons are:
1. Price.
2. More audio format support.
3. It's black :P

Audyssey MultEq XT is very nice and quite tempting, but since I plan on calibrating (probably poorly ^^; ) with DVE it's not that big of a loss I guess.

Re: Receiver opinion needed.
ToriLia #220100 09/06/08 02:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Your ear is a better judge of what you want to listen to than some machine anyway. Even as good as the Audyssey may be it is still only a starting point for tweaking to your individual taste. The YPAO will get you into the same area of the ballpark.

DVE and an SPL meter should also serve you quite well.



I, of course, keep waffling between the 3808 and the 663 for my step up to HD.


M80s/VP160/QS8s/EP350; M22s; M3s.
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
doormat #220104 09/06/08 03:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
If I didn't want the Gui and network connectivity I think I would be going with the 663, too good of a price point.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
jakewash #220107 09/06/08 03:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I would disagree with some comments about overlooking the Audyssey and other built in algorithm routines of the latest generation AVR's. Your ears and an SPL meter can't compensate for room acoustics, however, they are a good follow up compliment once you've run the auto setup, such as Audyssey, which exceeds the ability of YPAQ. Also, DVE is just OK.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Receiver opinion needed.
jakewash #220108 09/06/08 03:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
 Originally Posted By: jakewash
If I didn't want the Gui and network connectivity I think I would be going with the 663, too good of a price point.

And if it can't handle 4 ohm speakers like the M80 you can still add a cheap 2 channel pro amp like the Behringer A500 for the fronts and be well ahead in $ spent.

Its really about the features.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
fredk #220114 09/06/08 03:38 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Hey... hadn't seen anything about that amp before. After a quick Google, very tempting. The lack of a trigger is a serious downside, though.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Receiver opinion needed.
Ken.C #220117 09/06/08 03:43 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
$180? Wow.

Re: Receiver opinion needed.
Ken.C #220118 09/06/08 03:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
There has been some talk on audioholics on pro vs consumer amps. It seems the pro amps deliver a lot more watts per $. No fancy toys like 12v triggers though.

The 500 and 2500 are also used by the DIY sub crowd.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 845 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4