I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 24 |
O.k., I have gotten advise from folks on the board and Alan. I am now down to making final decisions regarding my new HT setup (not new equipment, just new location), and am obsessing. Here are my last questions:
Do any of the in/on-wall speakers Axiom sells work as surround and/or back speakers? If so, is there a noticeable difference in quality from the QS8s? If possible, I am considering among the following options:
1.A 5.1 setup with QS8s. 2.A 7.1 setup with QS8s. 3.A 5.1 setup with in/on-wall speakers as the surrounds. 4.7.1 setup with in/on-wall speakers as the surrounds and back. 5.7.1 setup with QS8s as surrounds and in/on-wall as backs.
In each case, the location of the speakers would be pretty close to what is recommended by Bose and Alan in his article. The thing that would be most "off" is the fact that the the left surround will be at a bit of a distance from the main seating area.
Frankly, my preference is option 4 or option 3, if they would give a good sound quality. (If that is an option, my next question would be how the trade-up works, as I already own 2 QS8s that are about three years old.)
To the extent it matters, the rest of my equipment is the EP350, VP150, and the M60s.
Thanks in advance for your further thoughts.
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
I think most people would say option 1 would give you what you want. The jump to 7.1 seems to have limited value except in certain rare circumstances. It might help to see your exact room layout. I'm sure the in/on-wall speakers would work as surrounds. I think it all comes down to distance. Closer to the seating area, and I think the QS8s would serve you better, further away, and maybe the in/on-walls would work better. At least that's what I gather from what I've read. I've only ever had my surround speakers fairly close to the seating area. Of course you should wait for more responses from more informed people. I was debating with what to buy for surrounds myself, as I didn't know how far my rear surrounds would be, but I finally decided to get QS8s all-around and keep them at appropriate distances by ceiling mounting them.
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
I haven't had time to really play with 7.1 -- I have a pair of M2s back in the "rear surround" position but not actually wired to the receiver -- but I have had a chance to do some serious QS8-vs-conventional (M2) testing and still feel the QS8s are worth every penny (and worth the extra space compared to built-ins), so my vote would be for option 1.
It's possible that a 7.1 system might add enough extra ambience to match a 5.1 QS8 system -- and in that case a 7.1 in-wall system (option 4) might be the right choice for you -- but that's the testing I have never had time to do.
Last edited by bridgman; 11/22/08 07:54 PM.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
I'll try to put it in simple terms:
Bookshelf speakers do ok, however, you have to be more in the sweet spot to get the full benefit. The Qs8's were designed to envelope or wrap you in the experience, as the engineers intended.
During action movies with bookshelf speakers the bullits will appear to be wizzing by you. With Qs8's they will go right through you, which would you rather experience?
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378 |
I would vote for option 1. You can always add more speakers if you feel you need them, and the QS8's are designed for surround. Also, DON'T put Alan and Bose in the same sentence if at all possible.
LFR1100 Actives,QS10HPx2,QS8x2,EP800,M3x4,M3x2 (Wood),M5HPx2 (Wood),AxiomAir,ADA1500-8,ADA1500-7
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
I vote for: yes, you are obsessing, but thats half the fun. I struggled with the subwoofer decision for the longest time. Drove myself crazy! The QS8s are one of the highest ranked surrounds in the industry. I guess that means I vote for #1
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 186
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 186 |
Well I am no expert by any means, I have however had bookshelf speakers as surrounds. They were Yamaha NS A526, then I bought a pair of QS8's. The difference was huge.
I would think that the QS8's are the way to go as they are designed specifically for that purpose.
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
What sirquack said! So another vote for option #1. I’ve done lots of listening using both M22s and QS8s as rears in a 7.1 setup and IMO the QS8s win no contest. So I imagine they would totally blow away in/on wall speakers since the M22 is a fantastic speaker itself.
I didn’t notice a big improvement moving from 5.1 to 7.1 but I think that has a lot to do with the rear of my room being symmetrical around my seating and placing the surrounds about half way between where surround and rear placement is normally recommended. I think that the less symmetrical the sides and back of your room are to your seating the more likely you will notice a benefit from 7.1. Also, I think a large area will also benefit more from 7.1 as the rear(s) speakers seem to help anchor the rear soundstage for directional sounds the same way the center anchors the front. So as Sroode suggests try option #1 as you can always add rears later.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868 |
Having used bookshelf speakers as surrounds inthepast, the QS 8s are a big improvement. Option 1.
Dave
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898 |
#1, and to make your decision easier, there really is no contest. (IMHO)
The QS8s are also by far the most flexible and forgiving in terms of placement, so since you're going to have one that is slightly out of the ideal position, the QS8s will deal with that better than a direct radiating speaker would.
Jason
Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
One more for QS8's, option 1. I ran direct radiating speakers and the 8's are a big improvement. I still have directs out at the cabin and want to get some QS4's for out there.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 24 |
Thanks everyone. The feedback makes my decision easy--Option 1. I am not a huge fan of the look of the surrounds on the wall, particularly where one will be going in the new room, but it definitely sounds like the benefit is worth the downside (which is not a huge downside in any event).
|
|
|
Re: I am Obsessing--Final Questions
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898 |
Glad to hear you've decided. You'll definitely be happy with the sound.
Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
1 members (rrlev),
365
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|