 Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725 |
I am still teetering between the w22's in a 7.2 system vs. the m80's in a 7.2 for a fairly large room (28' long, 18' wide, 11' height). I really like the on wall look to keep the room clutter free, but may miss the punch given by the m80's. Call Axiom as they had shown (on the owners club) that W80's were on there way so you'll have the best of both worlds.
High Gloss Cherry
M60 VP150 QS8
Open for Auditions but please don't drool on the High Gloss
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Well, if your walls are about 2 feet deep.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
It was a T80 not W series.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34
enthusiast
|
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34 |
Which Marantz is comparable to the Denon 3808? Does the Marantz sound better?
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
receivers don't "sound" different.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
I bet they make different noises if you drop them. Also, if you drop one on your foot, you might make a sound, too.
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34
enthusiast
|
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34 |
If one doesn't give out better sound, what is the point of paying more for a marantz or rotel?
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
The name, features etc, possibly slightly better specs here and there, ie crosstalk, THD at max volume etc., but usually none of it makes a bit of audible difference.
FWIW, Marantz is made by the same company as Denon.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 505 |
A "high end" audio store I visited told me my Denon was on the "bright side". I think I mentioned my concern with a bright speaker through a bright receiver in a bright room. (hardwood floors, leather couch, loveseat, and chair, and ventian blinds) Not much sound absorbtion. I happened to have bought a throw rug last night. My wife loves it. I told her I had to get something before my speakers get here. (That's right. There still not here yet!)
|
|
|
Re: Receiver choice
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
Was the salesman 'bright'!!! Bob, I've heard Denon receivers described as "neutral", I've heard them described as "bright" and I've heard them described as "warm". But most of all, I'm waiting for my speakers too, so I haven't heard them at all!!
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
845
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
