You are not logged in. [Log In]


Forums » General Discussion » Home Theater » Trio of M22

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#2473 - 04/06/02 02:23 AM Trio of M22
KurtisJ Offline
buff

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 46
Loc: Central Washington
I was just reading a review of the M&K K7 and K4 speakers. The reviewer (Secrets of Home Theatre...) stated the usual M-T-M layout of center channels was not used and instead M&K went with the T-M-M. He said it sounded better than most any M-T-M array out there. My question...would the M22 sound better than the VP100? Does the reviewer have a case with M-T-M vs. T-M-M?

Top
#2474 - 04/09/02 11:09 AM Re: Trio of M22
alan Offline

connoisseur

Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 3258
Loc: Toronto/New York/parry Sound
Hi Kurtis,
In theory, the T-M-M (or M-M-T) layout in a center-channel design could sound better than the typical M-T-M horizontal array--but with severely compromised lateral off-axis dispersion to the left or right side, depending on which way you lay out the drivers.

All speaker design is a matter of trade-offs. Simply placing any speaker--regardless of its driver layout--on top of or below a TV monitor changes its timbral signature because of the large front surface that the TV screen presents to the center channel speaker. Even wall-mounting a center-channel behind the TV monitor will significantly alter its timbral quality.

So in our search for absolute fidelity and a perfect timbral match do we simply do without a center speaker? That will certainly eliminate any timbral mismatch, that's for sure! But now we have to sit dead-center on the couch or the dialogue collapses to the left or right speaker. And no one else can participate, because the dialogue will follow them to the nearest speaker. Bummer! Even worse, it's sometimes hard to discern the dialogue and now we can't separately control its level.

So we accept a reasonable compromise between timbral fidelity, dialogue intelligibility, and social convenience in viewing home theater. The VP150 seems to get most everything right--a good timbral match between the M22ti's with excellent lateral dispersion to either side. The VP100 offers an agreeable combination of reasonable timbral match, good off-axis lateral dispersion to either side, price, and intelligibility. I can't tell you not to try an M22ti in the center--but will you accept the uneven lateral dispersion characteristics? Did the reviewer even address some of the inherent difficulties and trade-offs of center-channel speaker design?

Regards,

_________________________
Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)

Top
#2475 - 04/09/02 10:42 PM Re: Trio of M22
KurtisJ Offline
buff

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 46
Loc: Central Washington
Alan,
I thank you for your answer. This is just the one of several, perhaps many, questions bouncing around my head. All the reviews and user posts have been flattering to the Axiom line.

I am in the process of buying a house and in the basement is a 11' wide x 20' long x 7' tall room. It is earmarked for home theatre. So I have a month or less to decide on my speakers.

KurtisJ

Top

Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 
Forum Stats

15,224 Registered Members
15 Forums
23,995 Topics
424,061 Posts

Most users ever online:
883 @ 03/04/17 05:06 PM

Top Posters
Ken.C 18044
pmbuko 16437
SirQuack 13567
CV 11677
MarkSJohnson 11437
0 registered ()
201 Guests and
5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup