Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
davekro #255334 04/03/09 08:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
I'll get them glasses Adrian! So what were your deciding factors to go with the 2809? If I knew what I knew now, pre-outs would have bumped to the 2809 at least.

Last edited by davekro; 04/03/09 08:21 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
davekro #255338 04/03/09 08:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
Dave? Tease....... Tease........ Tease........




::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
MarkSJohnson #255341 04/03/09 08:47 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I bet those outfits are really hot onstage.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
Ken.C #255343 04/03/09 08:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
Nah.... nothin' but COOOOOOOL! \:\)


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
davekro #255344 04/03/09 08:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
When you compare the 2809 with the 3808, I didn't see enough difference between them to justify the diff in $$. My 2809 can easily play to earsplitting levels and has virtually the same features as the 3808 but perhaps the one thing I couldn't refuse (at the time) was a local dealer had the 2809 PLUS the Denon BD1800 for $1100 CN (about $850ish US). Budget was definitely a factor in my decision, and I'm sure I don't really need more power than the 2809(115 wts) but it has the preouts just in case. ;\)


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
Adrian #255360 04/03/09 09:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
Budgets are a fact of life, and if any of us was lighting our candles with $100 bills, we should be on a different site. Given that you have to basically eat the 1900, I would not even consider getting a 2 or 3000 series and would not worry about it for years to come. Right now, IMO, is a bad time to buy. Too many companies are just getting around to room correction, HDMI switching and HD audio. Enjoy the new speakers for a few years and get something more beefed up later.


Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
Zimm #255364 04/03/09 09:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I believe with the MultEQ XT you get upto 8 measurements and better filters. From their website...

"MultEQ XT, using the receiver interface, takes up to 8 measurements around the listening area and uses high resolution equalization filters for satellites and subwoofers. This is the most powerful built-in version of MultEQ for receivers."


"MultEQ takes up to 6 room position measurements, and uses mid-level resolution filters for satellites and subwoofers.
"


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
Ken.C #255401 04/03/09 10:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: kcarlile
I bet those outfits are really hot onstage.

When we saw them at Shoreline (Mountain View) a few year ago, they had on these full length coats covered with bling (looked like jewels). Either these coats added A LOT OF BULK, or these boys are big fellers! Great show complete with twirling guitar. ;\)


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
SirQuack #255404 04/03/09 11:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: sirquack

"MultEQ XT, using the receiver interface, takes up to 8 measurements around the listening area and uses high resolution equalization filters for satellites and subwoofers. This is the most powerful built-in version of MultEQ for receivers."


I now recall the extra two measurements. Does this makes any noticeable difference?

High res. filters... What does a filter do? How does a High res. filter do it better? I know the 3808 (maybe the 2809 too) had a better mic.

Charles, very good points about waiting for another generation or cycle. I was figuring I could sell the 1909 for about a $80-$100 loss (paid $485), so not too bad of a rental/ audition fee. ;\) Though the "ooooooh, GUI, ooooh, pre-outs, oooooh the rest of it..." has is pull, if I find the loud listening level limit of the 1909 passes my occasional ZZ Top, Queen, etc. (plus beer) rock outs, the 1909 should do me well for a while. Maybe when the economy turns around and my business picks up, be ready for some upgrades. Like maybe change from this little old (2008) 73" Mitsub. DLP to a big screen (projector). ;\)
I'm afraid it just never ends! <gasp>


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: From a 1909, how much better SQ to 2809. To 3808.
MarkSJohnson #255405 04/03/09 11:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: MarkSJohnson
Dave? Tease....... Tease........ Tease........


Now THAT'S cool right there, man. I don't care who ya are!
I'm sure Larry The Cable Guy would concur. \:\)


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 845 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4