Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: QS4 vs. W2 vs. T2 for surrounds
grunt #260645 05/17/09 10:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
As already mentioned by a couple of people, I would personally stick with the Qs but really it's up to you(and wifey), as it's your $.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: QS4 vs. W2 vs. T2 for surrounds
Adrian #260658 05/18/09 01:57 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 80
cblake Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 80
Thanks Dean for the sanity check. I just wanted to make sure it would work to have forward firing "side" surrounds. I've already used traditional bookshelf speakers in the recommended side surround locations, pointing toward the listener but a couple feet up, and I felt that the sound was too directional.

Obviously a QS series speaker would help that problem, but within my constraints I suspect that forward-firing will work the best. I could buy M2s on the rear wall and point them toward each other, but I'm afraid it would hit the listeners too directly, plus the extra back wall reflections.

-Cooper

Re: QS4 vs. W2 vs. T2 for surrounds
cblake #260660 05/18/09 04:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
No problem Cooper. In the end for me it’s mostly about cost vs returns. I really wanted some Focal or B&W speakers but after hearing the Axioms I bought I didn’t think the small incremental improvement (IMO) of the other 2 brands justified the cost for me at the time. I’m presently wrestling with the same issue in trying to decide on buying an amp.

One thing you might want to try if it’s aesthetically acceptable is to get the M2s and rather than directly wall mounting them make a couple small shelves to sit them on. That would give you a little flexibility in angling them for the best performance. Since you already experimented with another set of speakers I wasn’t sure if you tried this as an option. It gives you the added advantage of having a regular set of speakers to use in another role should you ever rearrange your system and find you want to try the QS(x) speakers.

Cheers,
Dean


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: QS4 vs. W2 vs. T2 for surrounds
grunt #260669 05/18/09 11:08 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 80
cblake Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 80
Yeah I just realized that before I order new speakers and tear a hole in the wall, I may as well try mounting an existing inexpensive pair of Polk speakers in the same spot to see how they sound. Shelves might be an option...

-Cooper

Re: QS4 vs. W2 vs. T2 for surrounds
cblake #260693 05/18/09 05:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
are you planning on ordering from the outlet and get 10% off, that may help sway your decision. Get the Q's for music AND movies.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (spiroh), 368 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4