Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Can sound quality differ between decoders?
ClubNeon #262639 06/05/09 04:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
cb919 Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Thanks for the explanation and link Chris. I used the search function on the DTS website and that FAQ did not turn up as a hit.

So it is true that it will take a hardware change in future PS3 models to enable this feature. I wonder if Sony would bother doing this?

Last edited by cb919; 06/05/09 04:48 PM.

Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Can sound quality differ between decoders?
cb919 #262649 06/05/09 06:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Yes, it would require Sony to use a different chip. They've already made at least 3 or 4 different hardware revisions of the PS3, but never changed out the HDMI chip. So I doubt they'll do it until they make a "PS three", like the smaller/thinner versions of the PS1 and PS2, which sometimes gained new features (like progressive scan DVD playback).

While I have a receiver which supports the decoding the the HD audio formats, I don't see a reason to do it that way. There is more than enough bandwidth on the HDMI cable, and if the player is doing the decoding then it can provide features like mixing in secondary audio (for things like commentary or interactive features). With bitsteaming that's not possible, and the secondary audio is unheard.

A decoder which passes the Dolby/DTS certification for the lossless formats will produce exactly the same output as any other properly functioning decoder. It doesn't matter if it's done in the player or in the receiver.

The one "benefit" enthusiasts always bring up, is if the receiver knows that it is a DTS-HD MA track with 5.1 channels and you've asked for 7.1 dematrixing, it will apply NEO:6 instead of Dolby ProLogic IIx. Know what? I like the sound field created by PL IIx more than NEO:6, and by sending LPCM to my receiver I can choose which algorithm to apply (conversely I can use NEO:6 with Dolby TrueHD, if I so wanted).

Bitsteaming gains nothing over decoding to LPCM, and actually loses some features or flexibility.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Where to decode? (w PS3)
ClubNeon #262652 06/05/09 07:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
cb919 Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
 Originally Posted By: ClubNeon

The one "benefit" enthusiasts always bring up, is if the receiver knows that it is a DTS-HD MA track with 5.1 channels and you've asked for 7.1 dematrixing, it will apply NEO:6 instead of Dolby ProLogic IIx. Know what? I like the sound field created by PL IIx more than NEO:6, and by sending LPCM to my receiver I can choose which algorithm to apply (conversely I can use NEO:6 with Dolby TrueHD, if I so wanted).


You are saying that Neo6 dematrixing can't be applied to a 7.1 PCM signal? (I'm not in front of my system so can't test this right now)

So other than the above question, the only benefit is to see your receiver light up with the HD audio format of choice?

Funny, cuz that's partly what triggered starting this thread in the 1st place! \:\/

Last edited by cb919; 06/05/09 07:29 PM.

Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Can sound quality differ between decoders?
cb919 #262653 06/05/09 07:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
No, Neo:6 can't be applied to a 7.1 PCM, because it's already using all 7 channels.

But Neo:6 -or- PL IIx can be applied to a 5.1 PCM. Where as some receivers limit the user to applying PL to Dolby bitsteams and Neo to DTS.

Yeah, all the bitsteam gets you is a light.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Can sound quality differ between decoders?
ClubNeon #262654 06/05/09 07:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
cb919 Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Oops, I meant 5.1 PCM - typo!

You know, this is great information and is something that I bet most people don't consider when shopping for AVR's. You don't need to pay for HD audio processing depending on where you decode.

Thanks! I have learned my something new for today - except it took me a few days to get there!


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Can sound quality differ between decoders?
Golden #262687 06/06/09 02:32 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
local
Offline
local
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 200
 Originally Posted By: Golden
The 507 does decode the new formats...


I did not know that. Thanks.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 365 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4