Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27321 12/09/03 07:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Axel Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Hello All
I am dismayed to learn that some manufacturers are still over stating their receivers power, are all manufacturers guilty of this do they take us for fools... I work in construction and a 2x4 is a 2x4 and a 2x6 is a 2x6 what is the point of publishing specs if they are false..?
I just bought a yammie rx-v1400 should I return the goddamn thing, yammie claims 7 x 110 but from what I have learned its about 35 per channel whats up?/////

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27322 12/09/03 07:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
*sigh*
Even a 2x4 isn't a 2x4...

In reply to:

Manufactured dimensions depend on the state of manufacture; a surfaced-dry softwood 2x4 is required by the American Softwood Lumber Standard (USDC 1970) to be a minimum of 1.5 inches by 3.5 inches. Actual dimensions are obtained by measuring individual pieces with calipers.



source

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27323 12/09/03 07:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 175
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 175
does it sound good to you at 35w per channel?

I personally feel they are lieing to us customers, and will no longer buy their product. My previous receiver was a Yamaha 2090.

What matters is how you like the sound. I just do nto liek being lied to, so they no longer get my money(for a receiver, that is).

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27324 12/09/03 07:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Yup. As I recall, the 2x4 dimension is how they are cut prior to being dried. Shrinkage occurs during the drying process.

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27325 12/09/03 08:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625
AXEL, a 10 year old 2x4 is not the same as a 50 year old, or 2 year old 2x4 is it. they surely don't measure 2 inches by 4 inches.

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27326 12/09/03 08:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Axel Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
well ok maybe a 2x4 wasnt the best comparison...
and yes there are good and bad 2x4s spf dry and green warped ones so on & so on
you guys are killing me! LOL
cheers

Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27327 12/09/03 08:53 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
There was an earlier thread where a large listing of claimed power vs. actual power was linked. The H/Ks appeared to be the best, as they in some cases UNDERstated the power.

Perhaps a better comparison would be a tape measure or something. Where an inch is always an inch...


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27328 12/09/03 09:09 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
M
mwc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
M
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
Check out this review. It's for the 2400 but it may be helpful. This review states that the 2400 will achieve full power with two channels running but drops with all channels running. I'm sure this applies to the 1400 as well.
www.audioholics.com/productreviews/avhardware/YamahaRXV-2400Receiver-p1.html


I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27329 12/09/03 09:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
So, Ken, if my Denon is 17.7 inches wide, how many wpc is that?

Don't get hung up on specs. I'm sure the Yamaha 1400 is a fine piece of gear, and that Yamaha is no more guilty of creative statistical interpretation than any other manufacturer.

Also, if you have a powered sub and reasonably efficient speakers (like Axioms), you are very unlikely to ever push your receiver to its limits without damaging your hearing. If you regularly listen very loudly, you probably should be looking at separates. For most folks, a good quality receiver is going to have plenty of juice for virtually any application.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Overstating AV Receiver Power -
#27330 12/09/03 09:56 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Axel, in my view power ratings aren't being "overstated"; the ratings are accurate in the light of different rating standards applied by different groups. As the 2400 review which Mike has linked points out, driving all channels at full power for an extended period of time isn't a realistic requirement for real-world operation. Music doesn't work that way, but instead has brief moments requiring high power, even less frequently in the surround channels, so this shouldn't be a matter of great concern.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,476
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (Hambrabi), 1,022 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4