Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 8 of 14 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 13 14
Re: M60 vs M80
JohnK #278929 11/13/09 04:41 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
 Originally Posted By: JohnK
Tater, maybe you've misunderstood the Dynamic EQ feature as compared to the Dynamic Volume, which is a type of volume compression and doesn't have to be used for most source material. The Dynamic EQ adjusts frequency response to compensate for our ears lower sensitivity to bass and treble at low volume levels and also increases the relative level of the surrounds in quieter passages. The general response to it has been highly favorable.


You're right, I didn't quite understand it by your definition... Sounds very interesting though. It sounds like it helps at lower volumes the most, which really won't help me a whole lot but perhaps it can't hurt to try it out. Does it react according to the volume the receiver is at, or according to the volume being output from a source (say a quiet scene in a movie)? If the latter, it sounds like a cool deal.

Re: M60 vs M80
Ken.C #278943 11/13/09 12:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
 Originally Posted By: kcarlile
No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!


"Let's not biccer and argue over who killed who.....this is a happy occaision!" \:D


"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
Re: M60 vs M80
JohnK #278963 11/13/09 05:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
CatBrat Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
After reading the reviews on the EP350, EP400 and EP500, it looks like the EP500 is the better contender for quality sound. Reviews said that the EP350 exhibited booming and port noise. That the EP400 was overpriced. That the EP500 didn't have booming and port noise.

Re: M60 vs M80
CatBrat #278964 11/13/09 05:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I suspect the EP350 reviews depend very much on which version they reviewed. The v3 is head and shoulders above the v2, which was head and shoulders above the original.

I don't think I've ever heard boominess or port noise from my v3.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: M60 vs M80
Ken.C #278966 11/13/09 05:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
CatBrat Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
Ah. I didn't consider that. The reviews were older and the EP350 was 200 watts and $620 instead of 300 watts and $758. Don't know what version it is though.

Re: M60 vs M80
CatBrat #278969 11/13/09 06:00 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Yeah, that's at most a v2. If the review has pictures, you can tell for sure. The v1 has a black dustcap and 2 vortex ports on the front. The v2 has no dustcap, but 2 vortex ports on the front. Both of these are also as deep as they are wide.

The v3 has no dustcap, has a slot port, and is as deep as it is tall.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: M60 vs M80
Ken.C #278971 11/13/09 06:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Nice description, Ken. I barely even had a twinge of "show me a picture".


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: M60 vs M80
tomtuttle #278976 11/13/09 06:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
CatBrat Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I was just reading an older thread here titled "QS4 vs QS8 ...." back in 2007. It was good and enlightening. It's the one where the surrounds were placed on soup cans. From reading this, I have decided to stay with the QS8, but to downgrade the center to the VP100, because it had more clarity for smaller rooms. The VP150 required more volume for the same sound.

Re: M60 vs M80
CatBrat #278986 11/13/09 08:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
I am pretty sure there is more than one "soup can stand" thread ;\)

I have the VP100 in a very large room and think it is wonderful.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: M60 vs M80
tomtuttle #279005 11/13/09 10:05 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
P
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
P
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
An EP500 in your room size is serious overkill, which isn't bad, just excessive, which can be fun :D.

I have an SVS sub that powerwise is close to the EP500 in my room (again, about 1750 ft^3) and it's riciculous... WAY louder than you would ever actually ever want it to be.

The 500 would reach a few db's lower though for movies obviously. I wouldn't consider the 400 for you, I am pretty certain it is much more of a musical sub.

Page 8 of 14 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 13 14

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 558 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4