Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: car audio
Murph #285219 01/04/10 10:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
I just bought a single DIN pioneer 5100ub that has two usb ports and an auxiliary input that works really well with the Iphone/Ipod/usb drive/ect. It retails for $209-$229 but found it on amazon during a sale for $160. One USB spot is in the front and one is in the back. I bought a 3' USB extension from monoprice for $1.78 for the rear USB port and ran the cord into the glovebox so that my wife and I can hook both of our iphones up at the same time (or 1 iphone and a usb drive, ect.)

It looks like the similar double DIN receiver from pioneer is shown for about $370 on the pioneer website, but after adding it to my amazon cart it sells for $259.

The Pioneer double DIN model is FH-P8000.


-David
Re: car audio
terzaghi #285242 01/05/10 02:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
I Listened to my wife's stereo today and I must say that I am pretty impressed with the ability to just plug in an iphone and listen to pandora radio on the go. The head unit has a sound retriever mode similar to the restorer on the newer denon receivers that make the internet radio stations sound pretty stinkin' good. If you want to spend a couple hundred on a single DIN or $250 on a double DIN I highly recommend the above pioneer head units (haven't seen the double DIN but I would guess it is very similar in functionality as our single DIN unit.) Let me know what you end up going with.


-David
Re: car audio
terzaghi #285358 01/05/10 03:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
Thanks David, I had a stock, then JVC traded from a guy who wanted to return to the stock look, then a Pioneer in my old Jeep and the Pioneer was by far the most user friendly. Of course the statement is unfair as it only represents the exact models owned.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: car audio
Murph #285989 01/08/10 09:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
I favor Alpine decks, and they have several double DIN models that let you exclude navigation from the option list to keep the price down. But it seems like Alpine is moving to the lower end in the last few years. Might be better off with a Pioneer or Kenwood, or Eclipse.


Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
Re: car audio
onn #289597 01/31/10 11:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
I am looking at the Alpine PXA-H100 as a possible auto eq.

My current configuration is:

JVC KD-HDR1
4 Focal 165 V1 component speakers
JL Audio 10 inch sub in custom cabinet
JL Audio 300/4 amp Class A/B to power the Focals
JL Audio 250/1 amp class D to power the sub

When I bought the system the JVC "head unit" was frowned upon and if memory serves the Alpine units were recommended, but I felt that HD radio was what I wanted and it does seem to sound quite a bit better than analog, so I went with the JVC which was one of the few head units with integrated HD radio at the time.

I love the Audyssey auto eq on the denon 3808 for my Axiom system. Are there different options for Audyssey in automotive applications that I should consider? You mention Audyssey Multi or Audyssey Pro? What's the difference, or where could I find out? With the 3808 I just use the original Audyssey, I didn't prefer any of the options that came with the upgrade (Dynamic EQ/Dynamic Volume), but from what I understand the Audyssey processing had been refined as of the 3808, is that correct? The 3808 was my first exposure to auto eq.

At this point since I like HD radio I am still thinking about keeping the JVC and adding an EQ unit as a standalone.

Thanks everyone who made comments,
SatKartr


"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
Re: car audio
SatKartr #289607 02/01/10 12:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
S
newbie
Offline
newbie
S
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Another idea for equalizers is the brand AudioControl. Your car speakers are all high end and AudioControl makes high end processors, used by car stereo audiophiles. Most of their electronics are made in the USA, not mass-produced overseas. I've been out of car audio for a while now so I can't recommend a particular model, but they are an excellent brand.

Re: car audio
SatKartr #289729 02/01/10 06:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi SatKartr,

Getting good car audio is kind of a nightmare, given the huge variability of car interiors and speaker locations. I used to serve as a judge at a car audio competition held in Toronto called "Northern Thunder," and I heard some very good custom installations as well as some really awful ones that just played at absurdly loud levels with ridiculous bass.

All that said, I don't know how old you are, but as I've grown older I find the intrusion of wind, engine, and road noise on top of relatively loud music playback (to overcome the interior noise) quite tiring at highway speeds (about 75 mph or 120 kph).

Those factors may account for some of what you are experiencing. I used a RatShack SPL meter to measure the interior SPL levels at hiway speeds and was shocked that the levels were over 100 dB SPL combined road noise and music, with subwoofer at 75 mph.

I cut back a lot for fear of damaging my hearing. The answer, as you mention, may simply be a car with much better insulation against road, wind and engine noise.

Regards,
Alan


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: car audio
alan #289756 02/01/10 06:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
I always wondered how loud my stereo was in my old Jeep, even with the top on, with my slightly over-sized and very aggressive tires. I thought about measuring it but sound quality at that point was so poor, I just stopped listening mostly. I'm betting it was dangerous levels.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: car audio
alan #290832 02/06/10 05:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 612
Thanks Alan,

You make a good point about healthy listening, I should pull out my radio shack meter once again and check the SPL levels, they may very well be over the top, especially at highway speeds, I'm sure that's a given and I need to take that to heart at such time I am next able to afford a more luxurious vehicle.

However, I was listening in the car again today and distinctly perceived, at both moderate and loud audio levels as well as city mph/low wind noise levels, that somewhere in the lower to mid treble range was contained the offending overemphasis, that annoying harshness, as opposed to the "open and airy" sensation of good EQ, to borrow JakeWalsh's phraseology. Of course perhaps the pursuit of neutral audio may be futile in the car setting, yet I remain convinced that anything is possible, given the march of modern technology and appropriate implementation.

I also suspect that the car setting may at present be an inherently less satisfying one in which to listen to music, because I love the Dolby surround processing that you have recommended for listening to music sources with the Axiom system, and of course there is no center speaker in my automobile.

The reason I persist in my quest is that before I implemented the Audyssey on my home theater system I had to turn up the Axioms to get the sense of fidelity I desired, and there was an edge of excessive volume I did not prefer. After I put the Audyssey into play I never again had the feeling of having to grit my teeth, i.e., there was no listener fatigue, and I had greatly expanded freedom to choose the volume that I preferred. On the other hand with music I noticed that I could crank up the volume way up and my ears never felt fatigued, logic would suggest the the volume may have at times been excessive.

Anyway at the moment we seldom play HT sources at reference volumes yet are mightily pleased with the fidelity and my hope remains that if I can attain more accurate EQ in the car I will not feel compelled to crank it up so much just to attain that sense of fidelity which the Axiom speakers appear capable of delivering at moderate volumes given appropriate EQ.

BTW I have never, and I literally mean never, implemented graphic eq with any appreciable satisfaction and have not resorted to tone controls since 1989 with the exception of rental cars. Perhaps a programmable parametric eq (e.g., AudioControl) would fit the bill but given my lack of success (lack of skill?) with tweaking graphic eq I have largely accepted that JohnK appears correct: it's hard to beat automatic parametric eq.

I suppose it sounds crazy to those for whom Audyssey has not worked, but in my living room the results with music have been nothing short of rapturous, which is dangerous because like everyone else I can't afford to lose touch with there and then (the future that looms), as opposed to the here and now (the present that leaves no trace). Hmmm, what might the attainment of musical nirvana in the mobile setting mean for my driving? :-)

Well excuse my babbling all if you will, I will post if results obtain when I implement an EQ in my automobile.

Thanks again
SK


"If you try to turn toward it, you go against it."
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,463
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 123 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4