Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 15 16
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
Adrian #292391 02/16/10 12:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569

The thing I like most about those who say we humans are upsetting “nature’s” balance is the presumption that we are not part of that “nature.” So if we do change the “nature” of the planet then I guess we’ll be the first species ever to do so. ;\)

And lets not forget that indigenous peoples lived in harmonious bliss with “nature” and each other until the indigenous-people-oppressing-no-regard-for-the-environment-capitalist-colonialist-militarist Western Europeans came along.

I often wonder what it must be like for Western left-wing intellectuals to live in a perpetual state of self/historical/species-loathing.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
pmbuko #292392 02/16/10 12:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
 Originally Posted By: pmbuko
 Originally Posted By: SRoode
LT said it before me... Snow on the ground in 49/50 states for the 1st time on record... Should we be pumping more carbon into the atmosphere to counterbalance the effect? ;\)

We (as the human race) are so small in comparison to this world. Even if a country like the USA, or Canada, China, or whomever decides to make cuts in carbon output, it will never make a real difference. Natural emissions are so much larger.


What you say is true, to a point. Natural emissions are much larger than human-caused emissions. But that's only part of the picture. Natural carbon emissions are also absorbed naturally (primarily by plants and the ocean). Nature has evolved to a point where the emission and absorption systems are in balance.

The carbon emissions human add to the mix are too much for nature to absorb. About 60% of our emissions end up in the atmosphere.

Source: http://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm


From the site your linked:

"Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook. He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year. He is not a climate scientist. Consequently, the science presented on Skeptical Science is not his own but taken directly from the peer reviewed scientific literature."

It's just like every other web site you can find out there pro or con global warming. This one is pro global warming, and even he admitted he is not a climate scientist.


LFR1100 Actives,QS10HPx2,QS8x2,EP800,M3x4,M3x2 (Wood),M5HPx2 (Wood),AxiomAir,ADA1500-8,ADA1500-7
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
Luke Smith #292393 02/16/10 12:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
 Originally Posted By: Luke Smith
 Originally Posted By: SRoode
We (as the human race) are so small in comparison to this world. Even if a country like the USA, or Canada, China, or whomever decides to make cuts in carbon output, it will never make a real difference. Natural emissions are so much larger.


Have you ever flown over land and looked out the window? I've flown from Brisbane to Perth here in Australia and theres hardly a single square mile of the land that hasn't been dramatically changed by humans. All of it has been cut into squares and leveled of its native vegetation and filled with things that we either find tasty, useful or both. Australia has a much smaller population than the US (22M v. 308M), but doesn't have dramatically less land (7.6M km^2 v. 9.8M km^2).

Its not *just* about emissions from tailpipes and smoke stacks, thats just part of it.


You can easily fly over nonpopulated areas of Australia, the US, China, Canada, etc. and see nothing forever. Regardless, you can also fly over the oceans (which cover 70% plus of the surface area of the Earth) and find no human existance. You can then also delve into the Earth itself, and find the volume under the surface area which has exponentially greater mass. One major volcanic eruption causes more expulsion to the atmosphere than most of the carbon output of humans over the course of decades.

Having said all of that, I am not a climatologist. But there sure seems to be a lot of snow this year...


LFR1100 Actives,QS10HPx2,QS8x2,EP800,M3x4,M3x2 (Wood),M5HPx2 (Wood),AxiomAir,ADA1500-8,ADA1500-7
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
Adrian #292394 02/16/10 01:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
So tell me, why is it that when there is some bad weather event we have some AGW advocate saying things like

"You can expect more of these events due to global warming"

But when the northern hemisphere has it's coldest winter for quite some time, the line is:

"This is the weather, not the climate"

From the BBC interview with Phil Jones from CRU - the guy in the epicentre of the climategate scandal :
Question:
Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming

His Answer : Yes, but only just....

In otherwords the warming since 1995, according to his records (which he has trouble managing appaently) say there has been warming since 1995, but it is so small that it is insignificant.

Link to interview (not an interpretation of the interview):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm


Last edited by madjak; 02/16/10 01:20 AM.

Now this is how you learn Philosophy :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm0Uq08xXhY
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
madjak #292395 02/16/10 01:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
Man these global warming threads have really been some hot topics lately.

We *finally* got our little share of global warming, 72F for a high today, a most welcomed temperature ... bad news is that it's supposed to only last through today, cold weather is supposed to roll back in tomorrow. Dammit.


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
RickF #292396 02/16/10 01:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
G
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
G
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
Talked to my mum today, 80 in SoCal, it's the first time I've missed CA since I left


Fronts/Wides:M22s in/on
Center:VP150/VP100 in/on
Hghts,SS,SR:QS8s
Sub:EP500
AVR:Onkyo 3008
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
madjak #292398 02/16/10 01:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
That's basically what I'm saying...scientists that are part of the green movement aren't necessarily providing the facts but rather their "interpretation" of them. Once they started adding or leaving out conflicting data to support their "interpretation" or "theory", imo they lose credibility just like someone who lies in a court of law....once that happens, you then start questioning the rest of the "facts".


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
Adrian #292404 02/16/10 01:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Adrian,

Once again, i agree completely. I am now at the point where I will not believe any science that isn't based on empirical evidence with released data. This modeling stuff is BS, IMHO.

I fear that many other people just won't believe science anymore, and something real will need to be addressed.


Now this is how you learn Philosophy :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm0Uq08xXhY
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
madjak #292406 02/16/10 02:15 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
U
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
U
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Yes, we should all believe the intellectual right, particularly from the States.
“Intellectual right”, is this not an oxymoron? Reminds me of Fox News, Fair and Balanced.
Look, over there, a shiny thing!


Some people are like Slinky's, not much use however, when pushed down stairs, they make you smile.
Re: Maybe Al Gore is onto something...
Ukiah #292408 02/16/10 02:23 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
U
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
U
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Don't get me wrong please. Megyn Kelly of Fox News is a fox, brain dead, but a fox.


Some people are like Slinky's, not much use however, when pushed down stairs, they make you smile.
Page 4 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 15 16

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 354 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4