Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578 |
Not sure yet, It will be to big for the room, planning for the future, but Im a thinking much past the 350 would acutually hurt in my room. Unless a big one would do fine low and I could move it later on.
Fronts/Wides:M22s in/on Center:VP150/VP100 in/on Hghts,SS,SR:QS8s Sub:EP500 AVR:Onkyo 3008
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
There is really no such thing as "too much sub"
You can turn the gain down on the sub and also lower the sub level on the receiver to make a large sub work in a small room if needed.
That being said, I think an ep350 will be fine for your room, and will work well in a larger room too.
But if you want to go bigger you always could.
-David
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443 |
I love my 500. It gives authority to anything (which is everything) that we listen to through the receiver.
"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Jeff, in that size room the QS4s should be plenty. No, you don't have to be concerned about a difference in the mid-woofer size with respect to the front speakers. It would be extremely subtle to the degree that it wouldn't be noticeable on typical surround material.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
4 QS8's would be my recommendation, as they offer that future proofing factor of a the larger room.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: A still new one more question, Some advise
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725 |
I'm currently running 7.1 in a room 10' wide by 20' long and 8' high. My couch is roughly 16' back from my display.
I wired the room for 7.1 in 2004 to future proof. When I upgraded my received and added the second set of QS8's I didn't find that the 4 QS8's are needed in my room. I think it looks great and I have all my speakers for the next house but in hindsight I think I should have went for a 2nd sub instead.
For awhile I was running M3's as rears and for multi channel music or speaker B for swithcing back and forth from M60 to M3. I liked this set up a bit better. Furthermore, I used the M3's as presence speakers up front (Yamaha feature) and found that was more beenficial than the 7.1
I think you may be surprised how much better your bass will be once you add a second sub or upgrade your current one. I thought my JBL 10" sub was awesome until I got my HSU....
High Gloss Cherry M60 VP150 QS8 Open for Auditions but please don't drool on the High Gloss
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,244
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|