Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Difference between impedence specs
#298249 03/24/10 05:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
I've seen impedance on speaker specs rated at 8,6,4,2 ohms and high end headphones like the HD650 that have an impedance 300 ohms. Then on amps that have input impedance at 9500 ohms.

What is the difference between these different impedance specs and what do they mean in layman terms?

Re: Difference between impedence specs
punisher101 #298254 03/24/10 05:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Impedance is the resistance* to the flow of current. High power amplifiers are rated to be stable into some impedance. If have nothing connected to the output of an amp, that air between the terminals presents nearly infinite impedance. On the other hand a piece of wire running between the terminals would be next to 0 impedance.

An amp doesn't like to have it's terminals shorted, but the reason may not be immediately obvious. What actually happens when you connect a current source to ground is the flow rate gets so high the electronic parts making up the device can't handle that much, so they overheat and fail.

So amps are rated for the minimum impedance which they can support. At the other end, a higher impedance doesn't really hurt anything, it just decreases the over-all efficiency of the speaker, thus requiring more power to play at the same volume level as another similar speaker of lower impedance.

I don't follow headphone specs too much, but the same applies there, just the amps are designed to run into higher impedance drivers while still presenting high enough listening levels.

As for the input impedance of a device. With some equipment, the output when connecting to another device must have a "matched impedance". This doesn't apply for the output of an amp driving a speaker, where the output is in the kΩ range (although it may have some effect on the dampening factor). But when connecting the output of a pre-amp to a power-amp, those two should be matched. Without getting too technical, it's basically like they have to be speaking the same language to communicate effectively. It isn't something really to worry about in consumer gear as everything with RCA jacks will work together.

*Resistance is actually the measurement of voltage loss through a circuit.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Difference between impedence specs
ClubNeon #298266 03/24/10 06:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
 Originally Posted By: ClubNeon
*Resistance is actually the measurement of voltage loss through a circuit.

Resistance is actually futile.


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Difference between impedence specs
MarkSJohnson #298267 03/24/10 06:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
 Originally Posted By: MarkSJohnson
Resistance is actually futile.


Women really don't like it when I tell them that.

Re: Difference between impedence specs
CV #298269 03/24/10 06:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
Women proved me wrong when I told them that.


Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
Re: Difference between impedence specs
medic8r #298281 03/24/10 07:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
You've both talked with women?


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Difference between impedence specs
MarkSJohnson #298287 03/24/10 07:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
It is also worth noting that speakers are rated at a 'nominal' impedance: an average of sorts. The actual impedance of a speaker varies with the frequency being produced.

Practically it doesn't mean much except when you have speakers with a low impedance. Very cheap receivers, or those with an overly active protective circuit will shut down with low impedance loads.

Not all receivers play nice with the M80. Thing is, there are enough receivers out there that do, that it is not much of an issue.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Difference between impedence specs
fredk #298288 03/24/10 07:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
You may have noticed that the treadjacking impedance of this forum is very low. As Mark wrote, resistance is futile.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Difference between impedence specs
fredk #298289 03/24/10 07:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
I'm blaming it on brain parasites.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Difference between impedence specs
ClubNeon #298291 03/24/10 08:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
I always blame Mark. No point starting a new trend.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: Difference between impedence specs
Adrian #298292 03/24/10 08:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Maybe Mark has a brain parasite?


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Difference between impedence specs
ClubNeon #298294 03/24/10 08:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Maybe Mark is a brain parasite.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Difference between impedence specs
Adrian #298295 03/24/10 08:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I'm blaming it on cat feces.

Re: Difference between impedence specs
CatBrat #298299 03/24/10 08:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
Maybe Mark is cat feces?


Oh.

Wait.


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Difference between impedence specs
MarkSJohnson #298302 03/24/10 08:23 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
The cat feces made a very funny post there!


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Difference between impedence specs
MarkSJohnson #298303 03/24/10 08:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Is that why your head is so big and shaped like a football?


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Difference between impedence specs
jakewash #298305 03/24/10 08:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
That is to counter the standing waves in his room.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: Difference between impedence specs
jakewash #298306 03/24/10 08:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
That's to increase apparent stereo separation. To me, everything sounds like a Hendrix recording.


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Difference between impedence specs
MarkSJohnson #298308 03/24/10 08:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
But when you play Hendrix, the flux capacitor reverses and it sounds like Lawrence Welk.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: Difference between impedence specs
Adrian #298309 03/24/10 08:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015


Re: Difference between impedence specs
Adrian #298367 03/25/10 05:17 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
Punisher, if your looking at speakers that are 2 ohm's you will need a serious amp to power them. The way that amplifier companies make the amp stable to a lower impedance is by adding transistors, the more transistors the more power and the lower the impedance the amp will be stable to.

Depending on the speaker manufacture, some label the normal impedance, others will give you the normal, and minimum at the frequency that the minimum occurs at.

Any average receiver will have a onboard amp powerful enough to power a 6 or 8 ohm speaker. Some receivers can power a 4 ohm load, Denons are popular.. for a 2 ohm speaker, most receivers will not have an amp powerful enough to power those, you will need to find a dedicated amp that is stabile to 2 ohms. Plan on spending some cash for one.

Re: Difference between impedence specs
dakkon #298438 03/25/10 05:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
Maybe I should have Mark talk to the women for me.


Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
Re: Difference between impedence specs
medic8r #298442 03/25/10 05:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
Thanks for the responses. Not quite clear about the explanations. I should probably explain the issue I'm having - I have a pair of Senheisser HD650 cans that are rated at 300ohms. I have Logitech Z5450 speaker which I sometimes listen to through my headphones.

The problem is I have the volume turned all the way up and it's not loud enough (sound is about average volume but not loud enough for me) through the headphones. Its probably because the Z5450 has a crappy amp for the headphone jack (even my iPhone is louder at higher volumes).

So presumbly I need a headphone amp to boost the volumes. And I'm trying to figure the proper impedence I would need on the amp. The nominal impedence on the z5450 is in the 1000s. But this won't drive those headphones.

So going back to my original question I am confused about how impedence is measured? Speakers in general are rated in single digit ohms. My headphones are rated at 300ohms. My speakers nominal impedence is rated in 1000s. Why is the metric so vastly different for different devices?

Re: Difference between impedence specs
punisher101 #298448 03/25/10 06:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Yeah, sometimes it helps to actually ask what you want to know. \:\)

Here's something from a website:

 Quote:
Impedance: One issue that's especially important when choosing a pair of headphones is impedance. So called low impedance and high impedance pairs should not be intermixed.

Low impedance headsets may vary from 75 ohms up to about 150 ohms. Phones in this impedance range may be directly plugged into the headphone jack routinely found on recording and playback equipment.

Higher impedances sets normally have an impedance of around 600 ohms; these are more useful in studio installations where many units may be wired in parallel for studio monitoring applications.

The 600-ohm models are more rugged than low impedance ones in that the higher resistance coils are less susceptible to burn out than low impedance models. On the other hand, high impedance sets require a higher driving signal to produce the same level of sound output in comparison to low impedance headsets.

This means that low impedance headphones will sound louder when plugged in devices with low output voltages such as portable CD players, etc. In reality, because of the limited power available from portable players, headsets for portable use should have a maximum impedance of 64 ohms.

Worth keeping in mind here that the lower the impedance, the more efficient headphones are in converting the incoming electrical energy into sound. On the contrary, the higher the impedance, the more electrical energy is required to drive the headsets tiny speakers.

So basically the amp can't drive the higher impedance of the semi-pro phones to the volume level you want. You need to get an amp designed to drive higher impedance levels.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Difference between impedence specs
punisher101 #298451 03/25/10 06:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I am not sure why you are looking at the input impedance on your Z5450 when you are looking to drive(output) to your headphones, 2 different things.

I will guess the Z5450 headphone jack is a very low line level voltage(0-3V) out for headphones and not passed through it's amp at all. So yes, you could use a headphone amp.

Last edited by jakewash; 03/25/10 06:46 PM.

Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 365 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4