You are not logged in. [Log In]


Forums » General Discussion » Home Theater » Audyssey Versus MCACC

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#299328 - 03/30/10 01:14 AM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: Dduval]
Micah Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 11/16/08
Posts: 1789
Loc: Indiana you hoser!!!!
 Originally Posted By: Dduval





Jesus Christ, that's freaking mess!
_________________________
My Stuff :

M80's
QS8's
VP150
EP800
Denon 4802
Emotiva XPA-3
Samsung BD-P3600
Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD

Top
#299344 - 03/30/10 06:58 AM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: Micah]
Wid Offline
axiomite

Registered: 06/22/03
Posts: 6789
Loc: The Peoples Republic of Il.

This is the reason some sub manufacturers recommend not using auto set up with their subs.
_________________________
Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud


Top
#299345 - 03/30/10 07:26 AM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: Micah]
Dduval Offline
devotee

Registered: 01/14/09
Posts: 349
 Originally Posted By: Micah


Jesus Christ, that's freaking mess!



WHAAHWAAAhhaaa!

That's funny!

Dana
_________________________
M80's, QS8's, M22's, CHT SHO-10, Dual CHT SS-18.1's, Onkyo NR3008, Mitsubishi WD-73740

Top
#299349 - 03/30/10 08:21 AM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: Dduval]
Micah Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 11/16/08
Posts: 1789
Loc: Indiana you hoser!!!!
What's the deal anyway, why are subs so hard to get right? Is it because most microphones lack the sensitivity required to accurately pick up those lower octave sound waves, making it difficult for the correction system to do its job of flattening them out? Or is it the nature of those bass notes that make them harder to pick up for some reason and just be a complete pain in the ass with the current correction technologies?

The reason I ask is because it seems as though about 90% of the problems I've seen come up around here while using Audyssey has been with the subwoofer.
_________________________
My Stuff :

M80's
QS8's
VP150
EP800
Denon 4802
Emotiva XPA-3
Samsung BD-P3600
Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD

Top
#299351 - 03/30/10 08:43 AM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: Micah]
casey01 Offline
aficionado

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 851
Loc: Toronto
You point out the inherent flaw in these room correction technologies in that they tend to stifle the bass too much especially at the low end. If you check around for info on this site you will find "somewhere"(I can't quite remember) a video from "President" Ian discussing this very issue in that microphones and also meters like the one from Radio Shack do not read bass response accurately below about 50hz. There is also a blurb about this in one of "Outlaw Audio's" manuals for one of their subs in which they talk about much of the same problem in that bass must be boosted manually at certain levels to compensate for this loss, hence, the problem you are discussing.

Although not everyone is in agreement about this, I would recommend something like the Velodyne SMS-1, the new Audyssey Bass management system or anything else that enables one to "fine tune" the overly reduced frequencies at the low end, that is, of course, if your sub can handle the boost.

In the end, it is always about what sounds good to you.

Top
#299391 - 03/30/10 12:11 PM Re: Audyssey Versus MCACC [Re: casey01]
Hansang Offline
aficionado

Registered: 02/07/07
Posts: 602
Loc: New York
Actually, I would say "in the end, it's always about what you're used to" Even if the best pro calibrator comes in and makes the perfect correction, most people (IMHO) prefer what they are used to.
_________________________
--
Denon 4520, EPIC80/500/VP180 Speakers

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 
Forum Stats

15,224 Registered Members
15 Forums
23,992 Topics
424,051 Posts

Most users ever online:
883 @ 03/04/17 05:06 PM

Top Posters
Ken.C 18044
pmbuko 16437
SirQuack 13567
CV 11677
MarkSJohnson 11437
1 registered (CV)
67 Guests and
3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup