M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 340
devotee
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 340 |
I'm moving to floorstanders for my media room and was listening to some B&W CM9s the other day. Haven't ever owned any and have never heard them until the other day. I've owned M60s, M22s, M2s, M3s, both centers and both surrounds from Axiom but never owned the M80s.
I'm curious to the similarities and / or differences between the 2 pairs of speakers-M80s & CM9s. Any comments or anyone who has heard them both??
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Not familiar with CM9s, but back when I was looking for speakers I compared M60's to 703's and I preferred the M60's overall, especially for the price.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
i have a pair of CM1's and the CM center ( the small one). These speakers are in my bedroom. In the living room i have M60's and V 150. To be honest, in my bedroom the CM's sound wonderful.
I have listened to the CM9's as well. If I was in your position, leaving money out of the scenario, i would get the CM9's, the finish on my CM1's is much better than the axioms, the components that go into the construction of the B&W's are of a higher quality than the axioms in my opinion. My favorite thing about the CM's is the fact that the grills use magnets to attach to the cabinet, so if you have the grills off, there aren't the typical Grill holes.....
I hope this helps you out.
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Dak, the point is that money can't be left out of the scenario. A nicer finish or the use of "quality", i.e., more expensive, components has no necessary correlation with sound quality. Axiom illustrates that it isn't necessary to pay "high end" prices to get high quality sound.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
I think that the Axioms are a better bang for the buck. I like the sound of B&W's more. However, when i bought my HT setup in the living room, i didn't have 10k$ to spend on speakers, so I got axioms. That is why i made the statement i did. Cgolf is comparing the M80's at 1300$ a pair to the CM9's which are 1500$ each..
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
To say that the CM9s have a nicer finish and sound good so buy them makes no sense to me if you haven't heard M80s as the OP was specifically looking for M80 comparisons. For the extra little money cgolf could upgrade the finish to a custom vinyl which I would bet looks as good or better than the CM9s, HG Cherry anyone?
The original question is still there, are the CM9's worth the extra $200 over M80s(paraphrased)? I can't answer that. I can say that the M80s sound a little different than the M60s and IMO are worth the extra money over the cost of M60s. I have no idea what CM9s sound like but I can certainly say the M80s are crisper/cleaner and reach a little deeper than M60s.
Last edited by jakewash; 04/03/10 05:55 PM.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Jay, were your M60's V2's and are your M80's V2's? You may have told me before, or mentioned it before, but I do not recall.
I've never heard the CM's. I have heard 703's, 704's, a couple of the 600 series and the 800 series. None of them made me want to knock the dust off my wallet. I prefer Paradigm over B/W, which is probably why I like Axioms.
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
They were both v2's as I had purchased the M60s and A/B'd with mojo's M80s which are v2's, I also did my own testing when my own M80's arrived, with the same results. I will say the difference is less noticeable at higher volume levels, ~80db and up, but for low volumes the differences were easily noticed, especially when A/B'd.
Mike, I still think you might prefer M60s over your M80s since you run them with resistors on the tweeters, unfortunately I have never heard M80s with the resistors to know how it sounds in relation to M60s.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
Listened to the B&W's while still debating Axiom. I like the B&W's better. Twice A$ good? Ahh, not to me. Do I love Sonus Faber's @ $12G a pair---every little thing about them, but I need to keep my car.
There are freight trains worth of speakers that are better in every way than Axioms. But I found nothing that made me really want them more until I cracked into 3G a pair territory. And I could have spent 4,000 bucks and still ended up with vinyl.
Or how about carbon fiber Hansens @ $240k. Bet they sound nicer than they look.
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: M80s vs. B&W CM9s
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
943
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|