Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Nashvegas Rocks #303923 04/30/10 12:17 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
S
snm69 Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Is there much of a difference in the amp, processing and other technicalities between the 10 and the 12? I looked at the website and read the details of both, and although there are differences, I don't really know what they mean.

Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
snm69 #303952 04/30/10 12:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
N
old hand
Offline
old hand
N
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
no not really, just deeper bass capabilities with the 12 inch. and the 10 is on back order :-)


M22's
VP100
QS4's
SVS PB12-NSD
Denon 2310CI
Panasonic P58S2
Panasonic P50S2
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Nashvegas Rocks #303974 04/30/10 05:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
S
snm69 Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
So here's another question that has come up during discussions...We would like something that excels musically, and I am getting the distinct impression that the SVS's may be "too big".

Any recommendations?

Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
snm69 #303977 04/30/10 05:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
You might want to consider a sealed sub, many people feel they are more accurate for music.


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Adrian #303987 04/30/10 06:09 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Ian has had some strong words about that in the past. His stance is that overall sub design matters a lot more than whether it's sealed or ported.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Ken.C #304012 04/30/10 06:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
That is pretty much what I have heard from other designers.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
snm69 #304014 04/30/10 06:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
 Originally Posted By: snm69
So here's another question that has come up during discussions...We would like something that excels musically, and I am getting the distinct impression that the SVS's may be "too big".

Any recommendations?

If you are at all handy I would suggest this kit from Creative Sound
Passive radiators offer the advantage of low extension of a ported sub with the size of a sealed design. It is also a relatively easy build and will outperform anything in that price range in a commercial sub.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
fredk #304135 05/01/10 02:29 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
N
old hand
Offline
old hand
N
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
I can say that i truly love my SVS sub BUT if you are looking to have dance parties at the house then maybe a different one is for you as I dont feel that my PD12-NSD is as good as it gets for music but yet is better than anything i have had. I think that maybe the SVS is more tuned for lower frequencies than heard is most music. This is all amateur opinion of course. For movies i cant imagine anything else in its price range really out performing it.


M22's
VP100
QS4's
SVS PB12-NSD
Denon 2310CI
Panasonic P58S2
Panasonic P50S2
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Adrian #304156 05/01/10 03:52 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
 Originally Posted By: Adrian
You might want to consider a sealed sub, many people feel they are more accurate for music.



I think those of us who grew up in car audio have that belief firmly embedded in our brains. That's because in large part if you grew up in car audio and wanted MAX SPL, you went with a ported subwoofer. Those who wanted to be able to distinguish one bass note from the next knew to get a sealed sub. It seems that back then anyways it must have been easier to get maximum volume from the ported design and vice versa for the sealed design. I don't know, I don't design subwoofers for a living, all I know is that is what EVERYONE would tell you when you were putting a system together. Walk into any car audio shop and the first thing out of their mouth was...

"What's your pleasure, SPL, or SQ"?

If you answered SPL they dropped a ported sub into your trunk and you were done. If you considered yourself an audiophile, then they hooked you up with a sealed sub.

Old habits die hard.


My Stuff :

M80's
QS8's
VP150
EP800
Denon 4802
Emotiva XPA-3
Samsung BD-P3600
Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
Re: EP175 or Velodyne DEQ10-R?
Micah #304165 05/01/10 05:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
N
old hand
Offline
old hand
N
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 92
very good point as that is still my belief right or wrong. i think of sealed as tighter and cleaner and ported as louder but boomier with less precision.


M22's
VP100
QS4's
SVS PB12-NSD
Denon 2310CI
Panasonic P58S2
Panasonic P50S2
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 667 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4