 Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
I was wondering if there'd be an Axiom guy commenting on this. Pretty much exactly what we've heard from Ian in our conference calls...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
You're discussing bi-amping in those calls?
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
Ya, he tried to prove a point by talking over two phones at once but nobody bought into it. 
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
Or he tried to talk into both ends of one single phone!
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
Or both his ends talked into a single phone....
Sorry, I'm done now.
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1 |
You don't want to be the guy to use THAT phone last.
***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1 |
***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 92
old hand
|
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 92 |
What exactly is happening when you do use the 2 sets of wires and switch the "Speaker C" button on the back of the Marantz to "biamp"? Is it just like using a really big gauge wire to send the same signal to the speaker? And why must that bridge be removed between the posts? (If you guys dont shoot me for all these amateur questions now you never will!)
M60, VP150, QS8, HSU VTF2-MK 3, Marantz SR8002, Oppo BDP-83SE, 50" Panasonic Plasma
|
|
|
Re: For biamping M60s, crossover need to be removed?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Not exactly. If you were biwiring but leaving the bridge on, you're using a big wire. That's what I do, just for the hell of it.
However, on the Marantz, you're actually using two electrically separate signal generators. So if you leave the strap on, you're routing signal from one amp into the other and vice versa. Then you get magic smoke.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
923
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
