Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
FireGuy #318485 08/14/10 12:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
A bigger hole in your wallet?


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
jakewash #318494 08/14/10 01:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
At $14 grand I would hope they throw in a beak or two...


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
fredk #318667 08/15/10 09:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Jc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Originally Posted By: fredk
. . . You are a brave man Jc. . . .

Thanks Fred !

Originally Posted By: fredk
. . . As far as the M80, I would suggest that in some rooms (very bare walls, not carpet...) they will sound a little bright because the highs are not rolled off at all.

The sound qualities and virtues of the M80 are constant and remain the same. To your point, the acoustic of a room will modify the sound which you hear. When this happen why associate the defect heard to the speaker rather than pointing out the guilty factor - the room acosutic ? Would that make it a more honest evaluation/judgemrnt of the speaker and, at the same time, a more exact appreciation of the situation?


jc
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
Jc #318693 08/16/10 03:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
You are correct on that last point Jc. I did not intend to suggest it was the speaker, but rather the speaker/room combination.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
BlueJays1 #318719 08/16/10 03:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 51
kordeo Offline OP
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 51
The only totems i've heard was the Totem Staff (Tower Speaker). I don't remember what the price was, although I didn't think it was super high. Maybe it was just for one speaker tho. I should hit the shop again and check it out. If they are priced high used would be an option, although that kind of scares me. And, after all, I am still leaning towards the M-80.


new-axiom-owner-in-training-rocking-an-internet-direct-stereo-setup-of-2AxiomM80s&1Outlaw 2150.
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
kordeo #318720 08/16/10 03:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
Three years ago, when I was finalizing my choices of speakers (just before I learned about Axiom, actually), I was dragged by a friend to a "listening contest" by a "unindentified company" that wanted to win over an important reseller in Montreal (for whom my friend performs installations once in a while).

We were seven and all seven were generally impressed by all the speakers we heard and thought it was probably a virtual tie between the three, assuming probably a slight plus for the "marvel speaker that only takes 250 hours of break in". The three speakers were: Totem Wind (the "marvel speaker"), Paradigm S8 and some Boston Acoustics (I can't remember which model exactly).

Once the speakers were unveiled and that the actual sequence in which we heard was matched with our scores of the 20+ tracks (half classics, half rock), the saleman was in shock that the points given elected the Paradigm S8 (by a large margin) and the B.A. a bit ahead of HIS Totem Wind.

Red-in-the-face, insufficient break-in period was blamed for this "charade of a test" (organized and supervised by him!) and a fight almost broke out with the store owner accused of "sabotaging" his highly superior speakers! And that, of course, we were all ignorant non-audiophiles!

Fun time. A few months afterward, I got M80s and I am still VERY happy with the road I chose.


See Mojo's signature
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
EFalardeau #318721 08/16/10 03:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
Thats a funny story.


I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
EFalardeau #318725 08/16/10 04:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Jc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Bonjour Éric !

I love your story ! ! ! Thanks for sharing!

Merci!


jc
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
fredk #318726 08/16/10 04:13 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Jc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 533
Originally Posted By: fredk
You are correct on that last point Jc. I did not intend to suggest it was the speaker, but rather the speaker/room combination.


Hi Fred,
I know what you meant but the reason why I was bringing it up is that I received too often comments about Axiom speakers being bright. All the time, these callers/emailers are referring to comments from the Axiom and other Forums.


jc
Re: m80 v3 harshness / Receiver
Jc #318775 08/16/10 10:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 51
kordeo Offline OP
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 51
I'm enjoying this thread. I'm liking what I'm hearing. I could add that bass is a high priority to me, being a bass player.. that seems to be another area where axiom has an edge over totem.


new-axiom-owner-in-training-rocking-an-internet-direct-stereo-setup-of-2AxiomM80s&1Outlaw 2150.
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 845 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4