 Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471 |
DUN dundun dundundundundundun
DUN dundun dundundundundundun
DUN dundun dundundundundundun
DUN dundun dundundundundundun ...
Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
As long as no one had a doctor named Feelgood, I think we're OK. Speak for yourself.
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
To get it back on topic, I've never had a Doctor named Swan 6.2.
Just sayin'. Thanks for bringing this back around. At the park, Bandit always barks at the swans, regardless their digital designation. I couldn't own any Swans. Too hissy.
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Would you say they're ... sibilant?
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
The Supreme National Organization of Gays (SNOG)prohibits us from ever using that word.
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Is there a Non-Supreme National Organization of Gays for which the Supreme National Organization of Gays needs to differentiate themselves? 
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 901 |
I know a contractor I do floors for named Dick Boss. 
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769 |
Yeah, I know plenty of those
Bruno
M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890
------------------------------------
"The problem is choice..."
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,596 Likes: 1 |
Is there a Non-Supreme National Organization of Gays for which the Supreme National Organization of Gays needs to differentiate themselves? Differentiation is unecessary, as long as the Lesbians just keep to themselves and stop ruining things for the rest of us. Kidding, kidding. They've never ruined anything for the rest of us, because we give them incorrect conference dates and locations.
Always call the place you live a house. When you're old, everyone else will call it a home.
|
|
|
Re: Just a note on the Swan 6.1 and 6.2 speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 340
devotee
|
|
devotee
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 340 |
OK, now that this thread has been hijacked, bound and tied, and thrown off into a black hole of randomness--Swans, M60s, lesbians and misc.  , I will bring it back to life with this one simple statement.................. I love my new M60s and they are so much better than the Swan 6.2s were!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
364
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
