|
|
 Re: EP350 versus EP500
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Will have to talk to the guy I'm quoting, I've always had Denon, and before that JVC, but I can explain to him the whole story. 
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: EP350 versus EP500
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Randy, as I mentioned in your other thread, that A4l deal on the 1008 would be excellent if, as you said, you wanted 9 output channels(presumably for 7-channel HT plus stereo in another room simultaneously). If seven channels would realistically be sufficient, though, you might consider instead the 808 for $650 or even the 180 for $350 which Steve got and which I've suggested to members a couple times.
It certainly would be better, if the budget was a problem, to spend less on the receiver rather than less on the speakers.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: EP350 versus EP500
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 76
old hand
|
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 76 |
John, it was your suggestion to someone on here that got me to look at the 180. For the price you can't beat it. You really get a upper middle class receiver for the price of a budget receiver. Thanks for making that suggestion. If I had not seen it I would have had to wait a while before purchasing something.
|
|
|
Re: EP350 versus EP500
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
667
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
