 Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
I am curious about the graphs that is used with Axiom speakers
How are these graphs done? At what db are they done and is there smoothing used with these.
The reason for asking is while trying to compare Axiom to speaker brand X it was said the comparison can not be made since two different methods were used.
If there is no set standard what good does it do to try and compare different brands using the supplied graphs from different makers.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
I would think, though I can't say for sure, that Axiom uses the same methods the NRC does as per the Soundstage Article.
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
When making comparisons of graphs made by different parties you want to note am I comparing the same suite of measurements? The scale that is being used, unsmoothed-smoothed, output level, measurement technique (anechoic, quasi-anechoic, in-room, ect). All these factors will have a dramatic effect on how one should interpret and compare loudspeaker measurements.
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
I am curious about the graphs that is used with Axiom speakers
How are these graphs done? At what db are they done and is there smoothing used with these.
Axiom used to use non-smoothed graphs. At some point they changed to what a lot of other manufacturers use. I suspect it was a marketing decision based on excessive questions about 'all those bumps'. The reason for asking is while trying to compare Axiom to speaker brand X it was said the comparison can not be made since two different methods were used. I think the case is over stated. It really depends on how much smoothing is applied. If there is no set standard what good does it do to try and compare different brands using the supplied graphs from different makers. That's what ears and your favourite music are for.  Lots of people claim a greater understanding of measurements and speaker design than they have. Gene's, um some persons comments on another forum, put that into perspective. 
Fred
-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8
President connoisseur
|
|
President connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8 |
Hi Fred,
I just wanted to note that we do not smooth any of our graphs. I am not sure where that piece of misinformation started but it could be related to someone comparing original series graphs to v3 graphs; the v3s are much smoother. There has been some talk lately of changing our graphs to a 60 dB scale and including some off axis graphs and the sound power. We will probably start changing the graphs on the site later next month.
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Rick, the fact that you even have to ask the question illustrates the problem: a reluctance to provide technical details(this is again apparent in the lack of meaningful information about the DSP for the LFR1100). Some points are evident from the graphs themselves; the SPL levels are now shown in the low 90s of decibels. This is about 4dB higher than numbers in the past, but despite repeated requests, no explanation for the change has been forthcoming. Since those numbers coincide with the new sensitivity ratings, they were taken with an input of 1 watt.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
Well, the topic came from another thread where it was claimed Axiom used smoothing and different levels to test their speaker. Hence one could not compare the two speakers in question because the measurements where done so different.
I am assuming Wid is getting his measurements off the Axiom website compared to that of Ascends off their website.
You can't compare the two simply for the fact that Axiom is using a 120db scale with smoothing applied while Ascend uses 50db scale un-smoothed.
These two factors alone can make a graph look a lot "smoother" when you cut down on the resolution.
Ascend also shows a whole suite of measurements including the polar response. To objectively compare the two you would have to compare the same suite of measurements using the same scale and preferably without any smoothing applied.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
Well, the topic came from another thread where it was claimed Axiom used smoothing and different levels to test their speaker. Hence one could not compare the two speakers in question because the measurements where done so different. I am assuming Wid is getting his measurements off the Axiom website compared to that of Ascends off their website. You can't compare the two simply for the fact that Axiom is using a 120db scale with smoothing applied while Ascend uses 50db scale un-smoothed. These two factors alone can make a graph look a lot "smoother" when you cut down on the resolution. Ascend also shows a whole suite of measurements including the polar response. To objectively compare the two you would have to compare the same suite of measurements using the same scale and preferably without any smoothing applied. [/quote Yes, they are done differently and not comparable as I stated. You can't compare a single measurement of one speaker to multiple measurements of another speaker. Also consider the measurement technique is different between the two. Axiom obviously uses an anechoic chamber to measure their speakers and those are done quasi-anechoic.
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 334 Likes: 5
Axiom Engineer devotee
|
|
Axiom Engineer devotee
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 334 Likes: 5 |
Rick, the fact that you even have to ask the question illustrates the problem: a reluctance to provide technical details(this is again apparent in the lack of meaningful information about the DSP for the LFR1100). Some points are evident from the graphs themselves; the SPL levels are now shown in the low 90s of decibels. This is about 4dB higher than numbers in the past, but despite repeated requests, no explanation for the change has been forthcoming. Since those numbers coincide with the new sensitivity ratings, they were taken with an input of 1 watt. Hi John, I'm not sure what meaningful information has not already been covered regarding the DSP. The dual DSPs perform frequency correction for the front and rear sections, along with a few other functions. The corrections tailor the system response so that the two sections of the speaker work together correctly.
|
|
|
Re: Axiom graphs
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
That's the reason for the question, to try and understand better.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
863
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
