Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
#382996 09/20/12 01:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 92
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 92
One of these days I'm gonna have the wherewithall to upgrade my current sub to Axiom. As I fantasize about that, it occurs to me that -- due to the rapidly esacalating prices of the larger and/or DSP-enabled models -- it would actually be cheaper to get two smaller subs, rather than one larger model. Say, for instance, two EP175s as compared to one EP500. I've often read about (but never experienced) the benefits of two subs in a room, to level out some of the quirks of room response.

I know I'd give up a few hertz at the very bottom end, and I know the DSP in the EP500 goes a long way toward leveling out frequency response. Nevertheless, it seems intriguing.

BTW, I've got a pretty big great room, about 20 by 20 with a vaulted ceiling that peaks at 20 feet. I'm using M22s with a VP150 and QS8s for surround. My current sub (a Klipsch) does a decent job of filling the space, but it's easy to localize. I can't help thinking that two smaller subs might end up providing a better soundfield over all.

And before you suggest it, I know two EP500s would be the best answer, but that's not even in the realm of the possible.

Whaddya'll think?


Music is the best -- FZ
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #382997 09/20/12 01:51 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Whip, I strongly lean toward favoring the two smaller subs if economics don't allow for the two bigger ones. Two widely separated subs do provide a 3dB higher volume and when correctly placed(basically, at the mid-points of either the side walls or the front and back wall, or in diagonally opposite corners)significantly smooth the bass response by reducing the effect of room modes.

Incidentally, I hope that you'll enjoy that Dvorak symphony disc.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383002 09/20/12 03:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
1
veteran
Offline
veteran
1
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
For me, I would go with the large sub option if use was primarily movies as the lower frequency extension is more important to me than max spl. If it were primarily for music, I think I would lean toward 2 smaller subs because not a lot of music plays extends below 35-40 hz (barring electronic stuff like dubstep or huge pipe organs).

Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383012 09/20/12 11:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,451
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,451
My personal opinion....strictly based upon anecdotal postings here... is that two 175s still won't approach the capabilities of one 500. Two 350s might have a shot at it, though.

Again, my opinion only is that your current sub is maybe being localized because it's outputting higher frequencies. If you were able to shift the crossover point lower so the sub is only outputting the lower end of the bass spectrum, and not the mid bass, localization would be less of a problem.

To me, this is the concern of using M22s in a big room. They may go loud enough, but they can't put out enough bass to take ANY duty away from a sub... they are absolutely reliant upon that sub (especially for movies).

BTW- when I say that this is anecdotal, I mean it: I've never heard the 22s, the 175, the current 350 or the 500. Seriously, it's all just theory.


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383016 09/20/12 12:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 172
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 172
While two smaller subs will give better room coverage, they won't give you that very low end (>20Hz) that is so wonderful and makes all the difference.

I have an EP500 and a 10" Polk and use both. When I do my calibration the difference in the very low end is huge.


For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert.
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383026 09/20/12 03:38 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 30
G
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
G
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 30
I'm also in the camp that small subs can't provide deep low end . . . which is very important if you like your movies. If you go with the bigger sub, you can always add on another big sub in the distant future . . . at least you'll be able to hear the LF that the movie is supposed to have. Two small subs will always be missing the lowest frequencies.

BTW, I use M22s, QS8s, a VP150 and ended up with the EP500 after trying the EP350. The 500 just goes lower and sounds better with this speaker combo.

Last edited by GuitarStv; 09/20/12 03:40 PM.
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383032 09/20/12 04:28 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
I have been using a larger sub for years, and I have been very happy with it. However, I have all of the "guts" to build an almost identical DIY sub to match it for smoother bass. So I had the investment into a single good sub in the past, and now that I have the money for a second sub (DIY for me, others may just buy a new factory one) I am going to smooth out that low end bass.


Farewell - June 4, 2020
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383047 09/21/12 02:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 92
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 92
Thanks for the interesting interplay of ideas. Of course, one approach would be to keep my Klipsch and add a second, large sub. However, I really want to move the Klipsch to my basement TV set up, which currently doesn't have one.

As for movies vs music, I keep trying to find that fine line that marries value with sound quality (music) and SPL (movies). I'm only going to have one really good set up and it has to do double duty, so to speak.

Although I realize it's a feeble argument, I can't help thinking that I won't miss that last half octave that I've never heard, so I find myself leaning toward the 2 smaller subs option. Either way, though, it's now gonna happen any time soon. frown


Music is the best -- FZ
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383107 09/21/12 11:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602
H
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
H
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602
I have the 175 and 500 (in two different places). I don't have two 175's, but I can't imagine two 175's coming anywhere close to EP500.


--
Denon 4520, EPIC80/500/VP180 Speakers
Re: Subs: 1 Big vs 2 Small
whippersnapper #383109 09/21/12 11:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 1
C
CV Online Confused
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Online Confused
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,829
Likes: 1
Yeah, going by the the comments I've seen, I wouldn't consider two 175s any kind of substitute for one 500. As Mark said, two 350s or one 500 would be my choices, but of course I'll defer to anyone who has actual experience with dual 175s.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,437
Posts433,100
Members15,428
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,437
SirQuack 13,697
CV 11,829
MarkSJohnson 11,451
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 265 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4