You are not logged in. [Log In]


Forums » General Discussion » Home Theater » Vp 160 vs Vp 180

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#383487 - 09/29/12 04:24 PM Vp 160 vs Vp 180
patwho Offline
buff

Registered: 03/27/08
Posts: 47
Loc: Long Island.N.Y
Hello looking to trade my 180 for a 160. The reason it's just to big in my room. I have m 80'sin the room. Is this a good idea. What is the sound difference? Thanks alot

Top
#383491 - 09/29/12 07:29 PM Re: Vp 160 vs Vp 180 [Re: patwho]
nickbuol Offline
axiomite

Registered: 09/16/04
Posts: 5325
Loc: Marion, IA
Too funny.. I have M60s and a VP180, you have M80s and want a VP160.

Anyway, I haven't personally heard the VP160, but have read that a lot of people really like it. Someone who has one will chime in I am sure. I would have gotten one had I not picked up the VP180 because the VP160 didn't exist yet...
_________________________
http://ht.buol.us
2-M60s, VP180, 8-M3s, SVS 20-39PCi, DIY Sub, 8-Shakers, JVC RS45, Anthem MRX-1120

Top
#383492 - 09/29/12 07:32 PM Re: Vp 160 vs Vp 180 [Re: patwho]
BlueJays1 Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 09/19/08
Posts: 4116
Loc: Porch,enjoying Bombay Sapphire
Moving from the VP180 to VP160 your trading off higher power handling and better dynamics due to the dual driver complement of the drivers in the VP180 to better off-axis performance of the VP160, particularly in the horizontal plane.

_________________________
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne

Top
#383493 - 09/29/12 08:29 PM Re: Vp 160 vs Vp 180 [Re: patwho]
terzaghi Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 04/04/07
Posts: 4870
Loc: Tulsa, Oklahoma
I haven't heard the vp160 but couldn't imagine trading in my vp180. I'm not sure that the vp160 is really that much smaller...
_________________________
-David

Top
#383500 - 09/30/12 09:04 AM Re: Vp 160 vs Vp 180 [Re: patwho]
SirQuack Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13571
Loc: Iowa
ditto on that, I would compare the dimensions, I think the vp160 is thicker from top to bottom. In regards to sound, I can't comment.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-4xM22ow-4xM3ic-EP600-2xEP350
Anthem AVM60 Outlaw 7700 Emotiva A500 Epson 5040UB



Top
#383502 - 09/30/12 11:21 AM Re: Vp 160 vs Vp 180 [Re: BlueJays1]
casey01 Offline
aficionado

Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 852
Loc: Toronto
Originally Posted By: BlueJays1
Moving from the VP180 to VP160 your trading off higher power handling and better dynamics due to the dual driver complement of the drivers in the VP180 to better off-axis performance of the VP160, particularly in the horizontal plane.



I have heard both and in comparing the two, I believe your assessment is pretty accurate. I ended up buying the VP160 because of size and weight issues and I would also concur that it does have a "slightly" better off-axis dispersion than the 180. The 160 is still a big "full-range" speaker that would meet the vast majority of any A/V requirements. The reality is these differences between the two are subtle and a matter of taste.

For those looking to upgrade, in my opinion, there is a much larger difference in performance between the VP150(which I also owned) and VP160 than there is between the 160 and 180.

Top

Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 
Forum Stats

15,244 Registered Members
15 Forums
24,029 Topics
424,383 Posts

Most users ever online:
883 @ 03/04/17 05:06 PM

Top Posters
Ken.C 18044
pmbuko 16437
SirQuack 13571
CV 11677
MarkSJohnson 11437
1 registered (CV)
189 Guests and
3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup