Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-888-352-9466 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Insider’s Sneak Peek: AxiomAeris

Axiom’s New Computer Speakers

Blind Listening Tests

Wall'O'Fame
Solarrdadd's 7.1 Apartment HT!
A promise is A promise... Axiom's second home
Who's Online
3 registered (HAY, theskins, craigsub), 44 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13365 Members
11 Forums
23116 Topics
408799 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17876
pmbuko 16328
SirQuack 13356
CV 11422
MarkSJohnson 11088
Meanwhile On Facebook

(y) if this is how music makes you feel.

May the Fourth be with you all!

(y) Great review from Christopher B! "The VP150 is an excellent center channel...

Any roadies / concert lovers out there think this is as cool as I do?

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#396508 - 08/27/13 03:25 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
Tommy214 Offline
regular

Registered: 07/23/13
Posts: 6
Sorry it took so long to respond the the advice that was offered . . . .

I decided to listen to everyone here and go with option 2. I got my qs8's a few weeks ago and all I can say is "WOW!" I had no idea how much I was missing. I can't even begin to express the difference. I was always of the opinion that the surround channels were the least important part of my 5.1 setup - boy, was I wrong!

Now, I'm just waiting for my vp160 to arrive (hurry up, Axiom!). I'm really looking forward to hearing how much of an improvement it brings, compared to the first generation vp150 that I just got rid of.

Thanks for the help! It was very much appreciated!


Edited by Tommy214 (08/27/13 03:26 PM)

Top
#396519 - 08/27/13 07:49 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
fredk Offline
axiomite

Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 7409
Loc: Canada
Originally Posted By: Tommy214
S... I got my qs8's a few weeks ago and all I can say is "WOW!" I had no idea how much I was missing...

Thanks for the help! It was very much appreciated!

smile Welcome to the world of HT. I still remember the wow moments when I first got my system.
_________________________
Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!

Top
#396857 - 09/04/13 12:37 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
Tommy214 Offline
regular

Registered: 07/23/13
Posts: 6
I received my vp160 yesterday and it is AMAZING!!! I wanted to share a few initial thoughts:

1) The difference between the vp150 and v160 is night and day. The m22s and vp160 blend perfectly, giving me a wall of sound. The thing that always bothered me about the vp150 was that I could always tell that the dialog was coming from it, especially if I wasn't exactly centered in from of it. No matter how I positioned or adjusted, everything sounded like it came out of a box. This is no longer a problem with the vp160!

2) Even though I did the measurements beforehand and knew the specs, I don't think anything can really prepare you for how big and deep the vp160 is. I would best describe it as "chunky". It makes the vp150 and the m22s look tiny.

3) I ended up selling of my old center channel a week before the vp160 arrived. So I turned off the qs8s and watched everything in stereo mode with the m22s and svs pb12+ taking care of everything for the entire week. Wow! For anyone out there who cannot afford to upgrade their entire system at once, the m22s and a quality sub is a great place to start. Once you hear them together, even for movies, you just might not be in as big of a hurry to get the center and surrounds as you originally thought you would be!

Top
#396864 - 09/04/13 06:01 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
CatBrat Offline
axiomite

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 6006
Loc: Milky Way Galaxy
I have the VP160 in-cabinet mounted under the TV, along with the M22 bookshelfs wall mounted. It is a seamless sounding system. And with the In-Cabinet, all you see is the front cover.

Top
#396870 - 09/04/13 07:22 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: CatBrat]
fredk Offline
axiomite

Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 7409
Loc: Canada
I'm glad you are enjoying your system so much. I have to say that when I compared the M22 + sub to the M60 and M80, I was quite impressed. The M80s are still a more capable speaker, but the M22 for fronts in an HT system are very, very capable.
_________________________
Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!

Top
#396872 - 09/04/13 07:52 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
Tommy214 Offline
regular

Registered: 07/23/13
Posts: 6
Fred,

Eventually, I will probably get a pair of m60s for fronts (even though I really have no good reason for getting them other than "I want them!") My next immediate upgrade will be a new receiver - probably a Denon, but I've been looking at the new Pioneer Elites with the new "D3" amps.

Top
#396873 - 09/04/13 08:44 PM Re: What would be best? [Re: Tommy214]
fredk Offline
axiomite

Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 7409
Loc: Canada
When I did a direct A/B comparison of the M22 + sub to the M60 at Axiom (this was v2) there was no real difference to me other than the sub playing lower than the tower. I suspect it would be the same with V3.

If you want to spend some 'just because' money, I would add a second sub or upgrade to the EP800 (or similar sub with greater low end extension than your current sub).
_________________________
Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2015 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.