In the process of downgrading my stereo system, I wanted to get a pair of bookshelf at reasonable price. Of course, being an Axiomís satisfied owner in the pass, I thought the M3 could be a good option. I wanted to stay in the sub of the 500$ price range. I was open to used equipment, which I firstly thought it could give me better ratio price/quality. However, the little M3 was on my list for sure.
I said I have been an Axiom owner in the pass, well it consisted of a full home theater system: M3 Ė VP150 Ė QS8 Ė EP350 that turned to be a set of M80 Ė VP150 Ė QS8 after a few months, all from the V2 version. So you got an idea of what experience I have had with Axiom.
So the M3 has been a part of a small stereo system for a short time and while I thought it was a good speaker, it certainly didnít gave me the musicality I would want (letís say full range sound), but being fair, we speaking of a 350$ monitor (4 years ago).
Anyway, few weeks ago I pulled the trigger for a brand new pair of M3 (Russian Maple with Die-Cast option), I know most say die-cast isnít bringing anything to the party but I will develop a little more lately. I asked Brent from Axiom Audio whoís says: The die cast basket is much weightier than the stamped basket and will dissipate heat faster, bringing up efficiencies while lowering distortion. This in turn allows you to send greater power to the woofer. Also, at higher output, there is the possibility that a stamped basket could ring, the die-cast will not ring at all.
I received the speaker few days ago. While the Russia Maple finish is beautiful, there is the standard, but high quality, craftsmanship from Axiom. Some minor changes caught my eyes. Firstly, of course, the magnetic grill which makes the speaker looking neat. The woofer border looks heavier and there is an Axiom logo on the lower woofer which I think gives a good touch of personality. Furthermore, I noticed the binding post has been changed, hard to remember if they are now higher quality but they works and feels good.
The very first hours on these speakers were awful. The sound was tiny and veil. The bass was absent and I remember saying to myself Oh no what I did. While not bad I said to myself they sounding like I recall. But few hours later, 15-20 hours, they really started to open up and get fuller. From what I remember, I know some active guys here arenít very agreed with burn in time but believe me it was day and night! At this time they might have 50-60hours and they only gets better every day. The voicing is now excellent, male and female voices are full and extended. The mids are good, not forward but linear, and the bass is accurate and tight. They sit 8 feetís apart and 3 feetís from the front wall so they are well clear to breath without restriction. Actually, the bass is where they impress me the most. Few reviews I have read say they are bass shy, but I disagree. While certainly not deep and heavy, the bass it tight and play with authority when you push them. Does it can come from the Die-Cast woofer? I do believe yes because they certainly didnít have that bass scale in the pass (V2 version). Brent says they are 1 pound and half heavier than the standard version, it surely brings something. Now, my M3 got body, authority and power to gives me soundstage and musicality I havenít felt from the V2, and I have a very large room!
Are they perfect? None are, but at this price range, I must say they are the surprise of the year. I really donít feel I downgraded from my last setup, and I had a 5K$ tower speaker. They do everything good and more. Axiom customer service is more that great, I got 5 years warranty, what else should I ask? I am just a happy customer! Bravo Axiom!
Edited by Philippe (12/19/13 05:26 PM)
Nad C356 DAC & C515
Grant Fidelity RPF-120 MKII
Analysis Plus Black Oval 12&10