|
|
 Re: Vp160 - Vp180 vs the HP versions
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
Just to add my 2 cents worth, I find that the VP160 blends in nearly perfectly with M22's and, to me, makes a better sonic match than the smaller centers, of which, I've tried them all.
|
|
|
Re: Vp160 - Vp180 vs the HP versions
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767 |
Ditto here.
I have both the M22s & VP160 AVR Xovers at 60 Hz...
TAM
|
|
|
Re: Vp160 - Vp180 vs the HP versions
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,171 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,171 Likes: 6 |
how does the VP180v3 compare to the VP180v4? I can understand the full range of sound coming from a left and right speaker, but wondering how much it is noticeable in the center channel?
Anthem: AVM60, Fosi DAC-Q5
Axiom: ADA1500, LFR1100 Actiive, QS8, EP500, M3, M3comp, M5
|
|
|
Re: Vp160 - Vp180 vs the HP versions
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Only Axiom would likely be able to quantify the difference between the v3 and v4 and my conjecture is that the answer would be "very damn little".
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
2 members (Cork, chapin99),
316
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
