Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414260 08/25/15 08:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Let's see the science (curves).


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414276 08/26/15 10:56 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 24
D
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
D
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 24
So... here's a link to the page with the graphs of impedance, etc...

http://www.axiomaudio.com/manuals/M60_Dual_Input.pdf

Not sure if that says anything to you guys? Look the same pretty much?

Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414291 08/28/15 02:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 24
D
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
D
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 24
Any thoughts on these graphs? These speakers look pretty much the same to me (judging by the graphs). Only a very slight variation (nothing I'd assume my ear could 'hear').

I think I'm on my way to being an M60 owner (non HP). Probably spend the extra $s on a power amp.

Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414294 08/28/15 03:13 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281
There is a slight increase in output at the lower frequencies. If you look at the physical attributes of the HP woofer it has a much larger surround which would indicate it has a longer Xmax which will allow the speaker to move further and have higher output. Now if you plan to use a subwoofer at any point then you don't need this extra output plus the sub would take a huge load off your main amp. It is the bass that consumes the most power from the amplifier so using bass management will allow the sub to take over those duties. Now if your a bass head like me you would do one of 2 things, get the HP's or add a sub. I know I have already said this but if your sticking to straight 2 channel listening I say go for the HP's. Tam will tell as I will also , I use subs with my 2 channel listening since my mains don't have much output below 60hz and I really like the way it sounds and the subs blend really nice so those are your choices. It seems your are really having difficulty with this final decision hopefully this will help sway you one way or another.


DOG is GOD spelled backwards.
What others think of me is none of my business.
M80 V3 MY GLOSS Cherry
Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414295 08/28/15 04:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767
E
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
E
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767
Ditto on 1 sub per channel in a 2 channel system.

I don't use any LFE control as my tube amp doesn't have that feature. Attaching the sub(s) to the Amps' Speaker Out connectors gives true 2 Channel, even in the low end, although common wisdom says that the low bass is mono anyway. I have several CDs where this is definitely not the case...

TAM

Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414298 08/28/15 04:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Those curves say that if you are going to listen at "sane" levels, stick with the standard.

If you want to listen at insane levels, you need to ask Axiom for a different set of curves. You need the curves for 105 dB and above. Those curves will likely show that the standard driver compresses while the HP driver keeps on going.

My advice continues to be go with the standard and save your money for a sub in the future. Even better, use the funds for room treatments.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414303 08/28/15 08:44 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
It is essentially the same, the graph shows that the lower level sounds are sustained easier by the High Powered Drivers. The flatter line with out so many dips.

Re: Sound Quality (Price not important): M60/80 vs...
DigitalGrit #414324 08/30/15 02:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I ended up going with non-HP, based on the response curves seeming to be flatter in the low end at the SPLs I usually frequented. Need a pair of HP's to be sure I did the right thing though. Sigh.

Last edited by bridgman; 08/30/15 02:24 AM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,464
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 175 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4