Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Would the VP180 V4 match well with the M60 V1?
craigsub #415033 10/17/15 12:23 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
Originally Posted By craigsub
The difference in timbre matching won't be as much of an issue as you might think.

Absolutely agree.

Timbre matching used to be all the argument years ago but i haven't heard much about it in years.
Overblown indeed, esp. when you are talking about speakers from the same brand that use the same parts.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: Would the VP180 V4 match well with the M60 V1?
mdavis #415549 11/20/15 05:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Originally Posted By Mojo
I'd love to hear the opinion from someone who has heard the 160 and 180 in the same environment.



I have heard both in my home at the same time. I found the VP180 was not as good for off axis listening in my room but it offered slightly better lower mid range performance than the VP160, ie. the gunshots in U-571 during the boarding scene had more impact with the 180 vs 160. If I recall there were some other minor sonic differences much like M80 vs M60.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Would the VP180 V4 match well with the M60 V1?
jakewash #415553 11/20/15 03:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 912
Likes: 4
C
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
C
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 912
Likes: 4
Originally Posted By jakewash
Originally Posted By Mojo
I'd love to hear the opinion from someone who has heard the 160 and 180 in the same environment.



I have heard both in my home at the same time. I found the VP180 was not as good for off axis listening in my room but it offered slightly better lower mid range performance than the VP160, ie. the gunshots in U-571 during the boarding scene had more impact with the 180 vs 160. If I recall there were some other minor sonic differences much like M80 vs M60.


Prior to my 180, I had the 160 as well and I found much like yourself, the 160 to have a little better off-axis performance than the VP180. I believe the design difference, although subtle, is to provide slightly better vertical(up/down)sound performance in the 180. Although I never listened to them at the same time, based on my best memory and to my ears anyway, their differences are really quite minor. The only reason I made the change was that because at the time, there was a sale on custom finish upgrades(my VP180 is piano gloss black)all to match my L/R M80s along with receiving real good trade-in value for my VP160, otherwise, I really doubt I would have made the change. So, in other words, strictly to satisfy my vanity.

Now that I am going through a major entertainment/rec room renovation, for the sake of handling ability, weight and space, in some respects, frankly, I wish I had the 160 back.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 401 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4