Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 49 of 49 1 2 47 48 49
Re: Out with the new and in with the newer
Mojo #443422 09/03/21 08:56 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
If you go heights like this:

https://www.dolby.com/siteassets/ab...s-setup/4_1_2_overhead_speaker_setup.pdf

Since you are MLP focused (no center channel) you can cheat the ceiling speakers closer together and ahead a bit. I wouldnt go for wall corner heights. As rrlev said best practice is seperation between bed and heights to get the best bubble effect.

Only way it works is if you go something like beds, heights and tops. But that is not supported strickly speaking by any single format.

If you put your M5OW on T-brackets on walls for surrounds and QS10s on ceiling that would be pretty badass.

Re: Out with the new and in with the newer
Mojo #443424 09/04/21 01:50 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
Mojo, I hear you on hurting your self …
As I get older I’m getting more cautious…
This ski season I’m gonna need to work out a bit before hitting the slopes. Never had to do that before.

Re: Out with the new and in with the newer
Mojo #443425 09/04/21 01:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
Trevor,
Interesting idea on QS10s for tops … might actually be badass especially in a low surround count system

Re: Out with the new and in with the newer
rrlev #443651 09/29/21 04:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 775
Likes: 40
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 775
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by rrlev
Not sure if that makes sense unless your going for ATMOS / DTS-X.

With only bed speakers the surround processing will assume a non-object format. So, I don’t think the LFRS will improve your experience, over the QS10s, given that you want a diffuse image in those formats. .

What is non object format versus object?

I googled it but it’s not clear to me what those articles are trying to tell me.

Last edited by Kodiak; 09/29/21 04:58 AM.

M60ti Hafler9505 & JFET Pre,Axiom Transformer. M3 Marantz PM7200 Dual 606 Denon 2700 M2 Yammy RX595
Re: Out with the new and in with the newer
Mojo #443652 09/29/21 12:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 101
ATMOS, DTS-x, Auro-3d are object formats because a sound “object” can be placed in 3d space by it’s xyz coordinates

Page 49 of 49 1 2 47 48 49

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 341 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4