Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
#438400 09/27/20 04:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
So normally I would think the larger driver would be the better speaker. But considering the frequencies reproduced in surround channels, which is better the M2 or the M3? Does the on wall vs bookshelf make a difference in this discussion.


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438401 09/27/20 04:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
The M5. smile

Bookshelf for you because you want more bass. Mount it with an FMB.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438466 09/30/20 09:05 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
P
newbie
Offline
newbie
P
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
Interested in this as well, was considering using some on-walls as Atmos heights.
Anyone have thoughts on which one would work best?

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438468 09/30/20 09:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 102
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 102
I’m using M3’s for heights and M3ow for tops but I imagine that you could use on walls all around

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
pigpen #438470 10/01/20 01:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
Originally Posted by pigpen
Interested in this as well, was considering using some on-walls as Atmos heights.
Anyone have thoughts on which one would work best?

M5.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438473 10/01/20 02:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Having listened to only the M5 and not the the M2 or M3s, I'm thinking the smaller driver will out perform the larger ones in the on wall series (due to cabinet size) especially when you take into consideration the signal being sent to the rear or front presence channels, or ATMOS. The only down side to the M2 and M3 is that they are nowhere near as sexy as the High Powered M5's.... here's a pic to prove my point!

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438474 10/01/20 02:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
The M5 outperforms the M2 and M3 always. That is an Axiom.

Rebulx, the M3 sounds like an M50 but less full and the M2 sounds like an M5 with less bass. The M3 and M2 sound very different. The M2 is 720p and the M3 is 480i.

Your M5s look swanky particularly with those roses you gave yourself. smile

Last edited by Mojo; 10/01/20 02:55 AM.

House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438476 10/01/20 03:07 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
I'll take your word for it Mojo, but considering the signals for ATMOS don't you think the M2 would be the better choice? Curious, as that is where i'm heading. I still have the M5's on walls and M80 on walls.

Last edited by Rebulx; 10/01/20 03:09 AM.

Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438478 10/01/20 03:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 117
What is it about the atmos signals that you think are better suited to the M2?

Atmos is full spectrum and dynamic range. Perfect for M5 or QS10. The M2 and M3 will distort long before the M5.

You want bass to originate from the intended channel. Strive to assign the sub to the .1 channel. Like me. Moooowaaahaha. Sounds so incredible!


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438484 10/01/20 05:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
I always thought surround rears and ATMOS were for frequencies above 80-100 hz. I guess it is true, you learn something everyday!


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics25,005
Posts442,842
Members15,661
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,852
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 641 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4