|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117 |
Rebulx, more pics please. LOL!
House of the Rising Sone Out in the mid or far field Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,955 Likes: 101
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,955 Likes: 101 |
The M3ow's are quite good. The M3c's I would avoid unless you need them for aesthetics ... they are a big compromise ... I would recommend M3ow for your ceiling speakers if the aesthetics work.
My take on the M3c sound: I have the in-ceiling installed in a few places. One of the problems I found was that they are a lot better in small spaces then large ones. In a medium-large space in which an M3 or M3 on-wall could do a reasonable job, the M3c's sound thin. The ones in much smaller rooms (like my master bathroom) sound good but nowhere as good as M3/M2 or anything else Axiom. Walking from the bath to the master playing M22s (with out sub) is a huge constant in sound (for the better).
|
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470 Likes: 11
devotee
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470 Likes: 11 |
Do you have pics Michael?
Lots of speakers from many manufactures...mostly Axiom
|
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117 |
Michael, please take pic-posting lessons from Rebulx.
House of the Rising Sone Out in the mid or far field Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
|
1 member likes this:
Rebulx |
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 321 Likes: 12
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 321 Likes: 12 |
The M2s are more neutral than the M3s, so I'd say it depends on what you fronts are. I see M22's in your signature, if that's you L/R I'd go with the M2. If you're using the M5 up from, then probably the M3s. (Full disclosure, I have M5s with M2s, but that's because I had M22s up front until I swapped in the M5s.)
|
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,524 Likes: 117 |
The M2s give improved clarity (detail) and dispersion at mid-range and lower high frequencies compared to the M3s. You have to cross them over at 80Hz if you're going to play loud otherwise the bass will distort. However, I would not call the distortion objectionable and it may even be considered pleasant.
The M3s are definitely warmer-sounding. I like both in their own way. I have the M2OW in the living room for stereo. I don't have a cross-over on my 2-channel receiver so the M2OW bass distorts just enough to make them warmer.
The M5s are like M2s with bass.
House of the Rising Sone Out in the mid or far field Linearity and mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 38
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 38 |
I’m using M3’s for heights and M3ow for tops but I imagine that you could use on walls all around How did you use the M3 ow for the tops? Mount them on the ceiling? Using the brackets provided by Axiom? Possible to share a pic? Thanks.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics25,000
Posts442,818
Members15,661
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
697
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|