Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Ceiling Heights and Expectations
#440979 02/01/21 04:13 AM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 775
Likes: 40
Kodiak Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 775
Likes: 40
Hi All,

Can someone point me to thread that discussed ceiling height. ? ( this would be easiest but if y’all want to jump in on a new thread I’d welcome it. I recall a good discussion a while back about room size shape dimension but can’t recall where that is or if there was a ceiling height discussion. ).

Or , please comment on your experience with ceiling heights in terms of quality of soundstage and imaging / holographic possibility or any nuances with various heights snd their sonic affects.

For example, differences between 8,9,10, or 12 foot ceilings.

Or if anyone can comment on 7 foot ceilings specifically or 12 foot ceilings specifically.

I’m thinking I sort of understand the sonic affects of large open spaces versus small ones and room shapes but height is one I haven’t considered much.

Thanks everybody,

Kodiak.


M60ti Hafler9505 & JFET Pre,Axiom Transformer. M3 Marantz PM7200 Dual 606 Denon 2700 M2 Yammy RX595
Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441043 02/03/21 04:13 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
Going out on a limb here since i haven't researched much on room dimensions post-media room build 15 years ago.

The ceiling heights play into the role no different than the total distances of walls that make up the room dimensions along with room shape. With a perfect square room (10x10x10), you will have reflection points that are easily calculated. Similar to a rectangular room (10x10x8) but the reflection points will be drawn out and not 'on top of' each other (so to speak) which vary more with increasingly different dimensions (15x8x21.5). The best designed rooms typically have some asymmetry to them and preferably less hard angles and it's why you see amphitheaters with those crazy ceiling shapes and typically a fan shape seating area. Even those rooms usually have acoustical treatments.

There are lots of good references on building a room and room dimensions, been discussed many times on these forums over the years, though i don't think i have any specific threads saved in my list of threads.
Trevor is best dialed in on this topic so if he doesn't respond, send him a PM. Best if you have a specific question to ask such as "my room is Y by X with Z ceilings and i want to add some sound panels to improve P"...


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441049 02/03/21 09:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
When designing my HT I was aiming for a 11’ finished ceiling for modal and large screen reasons. After many compromises I will end up with something like 8’ 10”. Bass wise I’m fairly sure it’s going to be fine given 4 subs to even things out but it’s going to be a bit tight screen wise. No problems with imaging ... right now the 1/2 finished height is 9’ 2” ... cement floor and plywood walls and ceiling.

Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441050 02/04/21 12:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
Resonances are calculated by 1130/2L

So 11’ ceilings = 1st order node of 51.36hz.

Ideal room is 10h x 17w x 23l

Avoid rooms with common dimensions or squares.

The neutral points for modes are 0.2/0.32/0.45/0.55/0.68/0.8 times any dimension. Putting listeners on these ratios, or speakers/subs ensures more neutral response. Avoid sitting in the middle of the length dimension. -Null at room fundamental and peak at 2nd harmonic.

Increasing height increases volume. Practically, there is no reason to expand height unless you are looking to accomodate tiered seating or as Rich is, a large screen. Beyond 10’ you are causing issues unless you plan on treatment. Long bare reflections = long decay times = Not nice. Long decay times lead to poor dynamics and decreased speech intelligibility (especially on the length axis.). Expect unpredictable zings and boings in tall ceiling rooms. Pop a balloon and see.

Large rooms trend to longer decay times in general. In reproduction, we want shortish times. In live sound we want longer times. In practice, it totally depends what you are using the room for and how many listeners, etc you are looking to fit. I would recommend you buy a reference book and stop online research. Lot of boneheads on AVS and youtube that will end up costing you wasted time. smile

FWIW, you can make any existing room feel bigger with diffusers.

Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441051 02/04/21 12:57 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 69
Fwiw, my basement HT is 7.5h x 14.5w x 22ish long. Height is A-ok.

Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441053 02/04/21 03:29 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
Yeah, the original plan had a lot more treatment in it. That got pulled when I decided that i was probably trying solve non-existent problems and that I should wait and see if I had them first. The exception to that was going with 4 subs. It would have been smarter if I ordered two and added more if needed but hey, sometimes one gets a bit carried away in this hobby smile

Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441055 02/04/21 03:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
You'd have never known if 2 were good enough. Sure, it would have sounded good, but could it have sounded better? With 4, you can test that. Four will sound better BTW.

Are you wondering about 8? smile


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Mojo #441057 02/04/21 03:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 101
Originally Posted by Mojo
Are you wondering about 8? smile
4 already takes up too much space ...

Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Kodiak #441058 02/04/21 04:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Maybe a stacked topology.

You may laugh but I've tried it. Room loading is soooooo much better with 500s stacked on 600s.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: Ceiling Heights and Expectations
Mojo #441059 02/04/21 04:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Mojo
You may laugh but I've tried it. Room loading is soooooo much better with 500s stacked on 600s.

EP1100s to go with LFR1100s?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 380 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4