Axiom Home Page Forums General Discussion The Water Cooler TYPES OF SACD'S

i went to this website to try and order some sacds on line. if you go to this site and look at the 'types' of sacds, it can get confusing. there are: hybrid stereo, hybrid multi-channel, single layer stereo, single layer multi channel, and some offered in mono?? what does all that mean?

which ones should sound the best? which ones should i stay away from? how do i decifer what all that means?

please give any advice or expertise. i am fixing to start purchasing these types of sacds/dvd-a's, and i want to be sure i am buying the right ones. this is all new to me, so be kind.

PS- the same website also sells records, i might just scoop up an armload of vinyl!!

bigjohn

Google, John.. Google! *G*

http://timefordvd.com/ref/SACDCompatibility.shtml

Bren R.

John, the site that Bren linked probably explains the different types of SACDs well enough, but you'll be happy to know that your question about what should sound best is essentially impossible to answer accurately. The quality of any type of disc depends on the quality of the original recording, mixing and mastering(in the case of an older recording newly released, remixing and remastering can result in a substantial improvement in sound over the original release). Although SACDs and DVD-As use higher sampling rates and/or bit numbers to achieve theoretically higher resolution, it's doubtful that this is actually of audible benefit; in any case, the recording, mixing and mastering swamp any difference in sampling rates or bits. An interesting explanation of this on another board by an engineer and movie music editor was linked here by me last year(search "soundhound", which he previously used).

One point that's clear is that if you wanted discrete multi-channel sound, obviously you should get that type of disc rather than one of the stereo SACDs.

Hybrid means it has a CD layer as well as the SACD layer. I am hoping you know what Multi channel, Stereo and Mono are.

OK, got it.. i will stick to the hybrid multi-channel.. i think thats what i am going for with buying an sacd in the first place!

thanks

bigjohn

Hey John...I know you're into Bluegrass so you might want to pick up a copy of the Nickel Creek Hybrid SACD. I haven't been able to listen to the 5.1 mix yet since I won't have my surrounds up till this weekend and I need to get the center channel wired, but I think you'd REALLY enjoy these kids (if you haven't already heard them) OH!! and see them live if you get the chance. Hands down the BEST acoustic show I've ever seen. \m/

spock- yeah, i saw that 'nickel creek' sacd when i was looking for some others. those are some talented kids. i liked what i have heard from them thus far.

i got to see allison krauss and union station live this past winter, and that was by far, the best acoustic show i have ever seen. i have their live album, and it is now avail in sacd format.

oh the decisions!!

bigjohn

Yes, I curse you for your link. How many of you have 'wishlists' at amazon.com, etc.? How many do you have in your list? I have 102. Also, I love Netflix, and have 60 movies in my que there. Now I have more. MORE.

Definitely stay away from the Thriller SACD. I actually think it sounds worse (definitely not better) than the CD version. And always Pink Floyd's DSOTM is highly recommended.

Yes I also have read that the new Thriller CD remaster is superior to the SACD version. Really drives home the point of how important a good mastering job is.