Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46218 05/17/04 11:29 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Edsynth Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
About a month ago I decided to start upgrading my 5.1 speaker set up which consisted of some older Yamaha book shelf mains and surrounds, an AIWA 150w sub and a JBL S-CenterII. I decided to try the M22Ti's for the mains, and I have been completely blown away with how great they sound.What an unbelieveable little speaker!


Eventually I will be replacing the center with a VP150 and my old sub with an SVS 20-39Pci. I'm not using the system for DVD-A or SACD. Just HT.

My next purchase is going to be the surrounds, and I'm having a hard time deciding between the QS8's and the M22Ti's. I built some wooden speaker stands for the surrounds a while back that hold my surrounds about 6' up, and I have them about 1' foot behind my listening area, aimed across the room facing each other with about '6 distance between them and the back wall. Even with my old crummy Yamaha bookshelves the surrounds are fairly immersive and do a fair job of creating an ambient surround effect with not too much localization.

I've read so many great things about the QS8's, but I must admit that I have never heard anything other than monopole direct fireing speakers. One one hand, I am thinking I should give the QS8's a try, and that I might get a much more immersive surround effect with them. I've figured out a way that I could modify my stands and use the bracket to hold the Qs8's freely without any obstruction to the woofers.

On the other hand, the placement of my current direct fireing surrounds give me a pretty good sound already, and I can't help but wonder how much better it might sound with M22Ti's, which would also be an exact match to my mains. I've read that having the same spreakers for mains and surrounds is a good way to go. I've also noticed that the M22Ti's go a bit lower in frequency than the Qs8's, but I don't know if that would make much difference. I know this question has probably been asked hundreds of times, but I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions?

Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46219 05/17/04 11:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 108
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 108
Call up Axiom an talk to them an see what they say i do know that there are a few people that use the MI22's for Rears an like them myself i am going to go qs4's when i get the Cash so good lick


If You Are Gonna Do It , Do It Right !!!
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46220 05/17/04 11:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
If this is for HT and not multi-channel audio as you've said, I whole heartedly suggest the QS8's. You won't be dissapointed.



Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46221 05/17/04 11:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
Welcome Ed (I'm assuming that is your name). I'm always reluctant to "recommend" any specific speaker setup, because others tastes may differ from mine. All I can do is tell you my experience.

I had some Cambridge Soundworks surround speakers which were selectable to dipolar or bipolar. So they were not monopolar (direct radiating). I replaced them with QS8s. With apologies to all the regulars who have heard this before, I have to say the thing that I notice about the QS8s is that I DON'T notice them. During a movie, several to many times, my old surrounds would call attention to themselves. I mean I would find myself NOTICING a sound effect coming from them. Before the Cambridge Soundworks surrounds I had small JBL direct radiators and they did the same thing. With the QS8s, I'll watch an entire movie without noticing the surround speakers even once. I just get immersed in the movie. I am knocked out by my QS8s.

I have recently changed from M22s to M60s as my mains. and I think the QS8s blended perfectly with both speakers. If you are indeed using your system primarily for HT, I don't think you would ever regret getting the QS8s.


Jack

"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46222 05/17/04 11:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 692
Edsynth,

I am one of the few who are using the M22's as rear surrounds. I am in a unique situation with currently living in a rent house with an unusual room config so the use of QS8's were not an option for me (at this time ). I do plan on getting some QS8's when we move into our new house down the road (as well as a new 7.1 receiver and a universal DVD player...then the M22's will perform double duty as rear surrounds for both movies and DVD-A / SACD.)

So, currently the M22's are acting as my rear surrounds on 31" stands in the back of my room. They work very well in the current set up (but would sound even better with some distance behind my current situation...sweet spot on back wall, M22's at 90 degrees to either side). They immerse you extremely well with the rainstorm and thunder in "Open Range"...in fact, you feel you are outside in the storm.

I have also only had monopole direct firing rears and am very impressed with the M22's handling of the surround channels.

The choice is yours...

Just my .02,

WhatFurrer


"Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup..."
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46223 05/18/04 12:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
I have QS8's and cannot recommend them highly enough.

I particularly like the ability to flush-mount them on the wall. The QS speakers are very flexible relative to placement; the M22's could require a bit of tinkering due to not only their directionality but also the port.

My opinion is that the only real compelling reason to get M22's instead is if you plan to do a very significant amount of discrete 5.1 channel audio (DVD-A / SACD).

All that being said, I'd love to hear WhatFurrer's setup!

I know, why don't you buy BOTH in preparation for 7.1, test them out, and let us know what you think!


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46224 05/18/04 12:44 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Edsynth Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks for the advice everyone. I've made up my mind to get the QS8's. And if I really don't like them, i'll pay the shipping and send them back and get the M22ti's. From hearing all the praise about them though, I doubt if that's going to happen.

I'll be ordering them on Wednesday, and I can't wait to get them!
Hey, maybe i'll have them in time for the 2 disc version of Return of the King on the 25th. That should be a good test for the new QS8's I would imagine!

Thanks again to everyone for your comments.

Ed

Last edited by Edsynth; 05/18/04 12:47 AM.
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46225 05/20/04 11:06 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Edsynth Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Well my QS8's are on the way. I've got my tracking numbers. Man I can't wait to hear them! I've never heard a bipole, dipole or quadpole speaker before, so this will really be a new experience for me. Woohoo! They should complement my M22's nicely. Next will be the VP150 in a few weeks, then a month or so after that, the SVS sub, and I'll be all done! Well, at least with my 5.1 set up. Then I guess it will be time for a 7.1 receiver. Oh yea, and I guess i'll need another pair of M22's for the rears. Hmmm.But after that, I'll be done! Well, with the audio anyway. Then it's time for a bigger display. But after that, I'll be done! Except for the...arrrg when will it end! somebody please make it stop! lol

Ed

Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46226 05/20/04 11:09 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
OK, don't get M22s for rears if you're using M22s for fronts. Talk about overkill! Get M2s for the rears. Other than that, haven't a clue when it'll stop. Try being broke. It helps slow the acquisition process...


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: QS8's or M22Ti for surrounds?
#46227 05/25/04 12:14 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Edsynth Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6
Well I got my QS8's today. I experimented with a few different positions and got them situated where they sound best to me. I then watched Gladiator to test them out. Holy **** do they sound amazing!

I had really high expectations after getting a pair of M22's a short while ago, and I must say I am even more impressed with the QS8's. I've never heard immersive surround sound like this before. And the timber match between the M22's and QS8's is very impressive. I'm totally blown away. VP150 and SVS sub are not far off.

Thanks to everyone who helped me decide. And not just in this thread, but the whole message board. I've learned a lot from reading tons of posts here over the past few months.

Tomorrow after work i'll stop by the local media shop, pick up Return Of The King, and give the QS8's another workout.

Ed



Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 364 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4