Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: My axioms are too bright
#55562 07/27/04 05:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
In reply to:

but if he say's there bright, there bright


Here bright, there bright, everywhere bright bright!

Sorry, lame attempt at grammar humor. Is that even possible -- grammar humor? No? I didn't think so.

Re: My axioms are too bright
#55563 07/27/04 05:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424


Re: My axioms are too bright
#55564 07/28/04 04:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
hmmmmm, just to be clear, you are saying 128 = 320 ?


Re: My axioms are too bright
#55565 07/28/04 04:11 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
No, I was saying I have MP3's at 128kbps to 320kbps. I have a few at 192kbps but most are at 320kbps. Everything I have ripped over the last year or so is at a fixed 320kbps. I'm not a fan of variable bit rates or lower bit rates.

Re: My axioms are too bright
#55566 07/28/04 04:47 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
--alt preset standard or extreme to the end!



Y use fixed?

Re: My axioms are too bright
#55567 07/28/04 04:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
In reply to:

Y use fixed?




Cut and paste from Exact Audio:

In reply to:

Bitrate is defined as the number of data points used to approximate the true wave form. Obviously, the higher the number, the more accurately the wave form is approximated.
For example, the current de facto standard is to encode MP3 at 192 kbps, or 192,000 bits per second. The CODEC takes the bitrate into consideration as it writes each frame to the bitstream. If the bitrate is low, the irrelevancy and redundancy criteria will be measured harshly, and more subtlety will be stripped out, resulting in a lower-quality product. If the bitrate is high, the CODEC will be applied with leniency, and the end result will sound better. Of course, the file size of the end product corresponds directly with the bitrate. For those that have enough storage, 320 kbps is as close to the source material as can be attained.





Re: My axioms are too bright
#55568 07/28/04 01:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
I have said it before, owning Axioms is like buying an HDTV.

When you buy an HDTV, you realize that many of the DVDs one owns are no longer watchable because they are not anamorphic or just mastered poorly. However, when one watches a well mastered DVD on an HDTV, it is incredible.

The same goes for music on a pair of Axioms, a well mastered CD will sound incredible but you will realize that many of the other CDs in your collection are actually quite poor.

Hip hop is made to sound good on poor quality speakers in big rooms. By getting rid of your Axioms, you may lose the ability to hear classical music. Is making hip hop music sound better and classical sound worse really going to make you happy? What if you find that after 7 months of listening to Axioms, you do not even like the sound of laid back speakers? I know I am keeping my HDTV and my Axioms.

As they say, ignorance is bliss. Oh, and alot of Hip hop artists have Bose speakers in their car, so maybe that is what would make it sound better to you. Honestly, I am serious, maybe with a slight wink, but I am serious.


Re: My axioms are too bright
#55569 07/29/04 05:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
Well, I'm definitely on the VBR side of things. It just makes sense, use as much bandwidth when needed. Hell all the presets in LAME use VBR, and I trust the ppl that develop that encoder since it is the best one out there.

Sorry for the hijack, it's just normal in these parts


Re: My axioms are too bright
#55570 07/29/04 06:08 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
I'm with you INANE. I've been using EAC with the Lame encoder for a while now. Sounds good.

However, considering how cheap harddrive space is these days I'm sorely tempted at times to just rip everything lossless. Why worry about harddrive space (compressing sound) when you can setup a 500gig stripped raid array for $300.00. Shiney!
Oh wait. They are working on an MP3 codec that can do surround sound as well. How large are those files going to be? Ack!

jr



"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." C Hitchens
Re: My axioms are too bright
#55571 07/30/04 01:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 359
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 359
thanks for the responses guys. I think I might try to sell my m60s(not the vp100 or qs8) because most of the music i listen to is poorly recorded pop. Although I its probable I will lose out on classical recordings I would rather have decent classical and decent everything else then great classical and bad most everything else.


Once You Pop You Can't Stop
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 896 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4