Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: John, what do you mean by not using it's......
#65728 10/25/04 08:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
True but like I posted before, a lot of peeps like 2 channel as 2 channel. Meaning no sub. I know that as far as I go, I only use my sub about 50% of the time when I sit down and listen to tunes.

Re: John, what do you mean by not using it's......
#65729 10/25/04 08:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
Seems to me that he is already running a good receiver - a NAD at 80 watts per channel. I would think that’s plenty of power to drive his speakers. If he were running a $100 POS amp, then I’d be taking your side as well, because when I upgraded my AVR, I experienced a night and day difference. But, again, that was going from a POS to a decent AVR.

I noticed a big difference in sound with the sub, and I use it strictly for music. Just for reference, I bought a radio shack digital sound meter and played with it the other day. Was just a bit hung over, so I didn’t get too carried away. At +10 db on the H/K (and it’s range is +/-80 db), 15’ away from the M80’s, the meter was reading 104 – 107 db’s playing Audioslave. If I turn off the sub, the db’s dropped to 102 – 105. The H/K is rated at 100 watts per channel, just slightly more than his NAD.


Re: John, what do you mean by not using it's......
#65730 10/26/04 01:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
In reply to:

playing Audioslave




I love cranking Like A Stone. I'm going to blow something up playing that song! lol You picked one song that I always make sure the sub is on!

Re: John, what do you mean by not using it's......
#65731 10/26/04 02:20 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
AHA!


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: John, what do you mean by not using it's..........
#65732 10/26/04 04:24 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Todd what was meant is that your NAD probably has more power capacity than you can use and that there's no need to "increase power".


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Thanks John for clarifying.........
#65733 10/26/04 11:11 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
T
Todd Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
T
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
Thanks everyone for their responses. I just wanted to make sure I was getting the most out of my 60's. I've heard all of the bi-amping and bi-wiring and other stuff. Or is that another thread.........

Amps
#65734 10/26/04 02:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
If your ready to invest in stand alone cross-overs, bi-amping does wonders. Bi-wiring on the other hand is a debate. Some think it does wonders, others don't. I bi-wire my fronts only because I can.

I do agree with JohnK however with respect to your current amp. NAD's stuff puts out plenty of power for most applications. If you went with a big-ass amp you would notice a change in overall DB and depending on what kind of amp you went with, the amp itself may bring a few of it's own characteristics to the table.


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 896 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4