Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82631 02/24/05 08:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
In reply to:

We're still talking about speakers here, right?


Testes, testes, 1 ... 2 ... 3 ?

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82632 02/24/05 01:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 828
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 828
huhhuh....shutup beavis


------------------------------------------------
Leave the gun, Take the canolis.
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82633 02/24/05 02:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>We're still talking about speakers here, right?

Yes... we... are... talking... about... speakers.

The layout isn't great today -- it's also temporary until I have time to move everything back to the other end of the basement where things sound better.

The mains and center are on a ~30 degree angle at one end of the room, sort-of in the corner. The long wall is split on one side by a stone fireplace and on the other side by a built-in bar that runs almost to the ceiling.

Like this. If I did this with M2s the sound would have been pretty bizarre, but with the QS8s it sounds quite normal.



M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82634 02/24/05 06:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
3 foot high soup cans?

That's a lot of Campbell's Chunky!

Bren R.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82635 02/25/05 01:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 946
Likes: 2
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 946
Likes: 2
Actually I think the soup is 'Habitant' pea soup

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82636 02/25/05 01:56 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Yes, Habitant it is. Not to worry, Bren. The soup cans are on top of two stacked end tables. I only had enough soup cans for about a foot and a half and the result seemed a bit wobbly even for something I would build. Pics in this thread :

http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=Advice&Number=82220&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=7&fpart=1

EDIT -- I believe Romeo deserves credit for the idea. He used four Campbell's cans instead, no doubt for increased clarity and tighter bass.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82637 02/25/05 07:28 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
In reply to:

EDIT -- I believe Romeo deserves credit for the idea. He used four Campbell's cans instead, no doubt for increased clarity and tighter bass.



That clarity is Mmm Mmm Good!

Bren R.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82638 02/25/05 07:29 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
True... but you can't stand a spoon up in it. It's not very thick bass.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (spiroh), 368 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4