|
|
 M22 or M40
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1 |
Hello, I have a Harman Kardon avr75 70 wpc, I will be using strictly for stereo. I will also be using a older Yamaha powered sub. Would the M22 be enough or should I step up to the M40's. Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
 Re: M22 or M40
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 92 |
I don't have either, but the M22's seem to get extremely rave reviews.
Rick
|
|
|
Re: M22 or M40
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi stumper,
The M22ti's have wonderful midrange and upper octave clarity. The M40s are more laid-back and a bit more recessed in the mids, rather like the M3ti bookshelf model.
Regards,
Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: M22 or M40
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
devotee
|
|
devotee
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345 |
It depends on your musical tastes, because the speakers have different character. The M40 is the better speaker for popular recordings, while the accuracy of the M22 shows itself off with classical and jazz music.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
661
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
