Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
#334868 01/19/11 01:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
T
Tariq Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
T
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Hi,

I am setting up my new play room in my new home, and while I was doing some background work, I found some talk about the Audyssy DSX. It seems to be a fairly new development and the information seems to be a little sketchy as to the benefits of the so-called 9.2 setup.

My current system is 7.1 and I am planning to go 7.2 in the new HT. I am now considering adding two more channels to get the 9.2 setup. Another alternative would be to go for a Dolby 9.2 which is easier for me to do with the shape of the room and the layout of equipment. A third alternative would be to stay with the measly 7.2 smile.

So, these are my questions:

1. Has anyone tried a 9.2 setup? Did people appreciate the difference between it and a 7.2/7.1?

2. Audyssy or Dolby 9.2?

3. Will the QS8V3 be a suitable match for my M80ti & QS8V1 with regards to a 9.2 setup? i.e. can I use the QS8V3's for the "height" or "width" channel?

Last edited by Tariq; 01/19/11 02:26 AM.

Tariq

M80v2 - VP180 - S:QS8 - SB:QS8 - SWide:QS8
Denon 4311 + XPA-3
Sub: Dual SVS Ultra-13
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
Tariq #334870 01/19/11 01:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
There really are not a lot of movies out there recorded in 7. let alone 9. channels. Using PLIIx and newer decoders can matrix using those channels though. Adding a .2 versus .1 can help you even out the low sub frequencies in a room if placed correctly.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
Tariq #334886 01/19/11 05:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
Originally Posted By: Tariq

1. Has anyone tried a 9.2 setup? Did people appreciate the difference between it and a 7.2/7.1?

My setup it 11.2, however my Onkyo only supports 9.2 either wide or height but not both at the same time. My room is 13x21x8-12 foot vaulted. Using wide speakers in the narrow room makes a huge difference in the width of the front soundstage and helping it blend with the surround speakers. However, if you have a room that allows placing your mains far enough apart wide speakers won’t help as much.

IMO height speakers, DSX or Dolby aren’t as impressive in my room as the wide speakers. This is mainly because the wide speakers come into play during almost every scene where as the height speakers tend to be more specialized only really kicking in during certain scenes, mostly those with all-round ambient sounds like wind, rain , echoes and some music. I also think that having a vaulted ceiling helps add to their effect.

Quote:

2. Audyssy or Dolby 9.2?

I really can’t tell any difference between Dolby or DSX height speakers. I almost exclusively use DSX because I find the wide speakers add more in my room and there is no Dolby wide setting on my receiver.

Quote:

3. Will the QS8V3 be a suitable match for my M80ti & QS8V1 with regards to a 9.2 setup? i.e. can I use the QS8V3's for the "height" or "width" channel?

I have a pair of QS8v3 in use with my other v2 speakers and can’t hear the difference. Since they mostly produce ambient sounds I doubt any difference is going to be noticeable even with the “ti” versions.

QS speakers are the best for height channels. OTOH M2 speakers are a perfect match as wide speakers for the M80s. The QS8 don’t work very well as wide speakers compared to the M2s or M22s. Also I think the M22s are overkill as wide speakers, no need to go any larger than the M2s.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
SirQuack #334889 01/19/11 05:24 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 144
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 144
I've been using 7.1 with Dolby IIz height channels since last spring up to a week ago, then 9.2 with either Dolby or Audyssey height channels. I really like height channels, and the 9.2 system has better sound quality than my previous 7.1 system. (Next week, I'll have a chance to hear 9.2 Audyssey with width speakers, when my new speakers arrive.)


Greg
VP180, M80s, M22s, QS8(4), CSW S305s, EP500, Pioneer VSX-90
M2i, M3(2), Pio vsx-1020
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
GregLee #334891 01/19/11 05:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
Most importantly, you get to buy 2 more speakers.

Axiom should give those 9.2-11.2 Onks away.


Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
2x6spds #334892 01/19/11 05:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
Originally Posted By: 2x6spds
Most importantly, you get to buy 2 more speakers.

Axiom should give those 9.2-11.2 Onks away.


Bucking for a position on the customer council? wink


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
grunt #334893 01/19/11 05:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
busted ... again


Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
2x6spds #334899 01/19/11 07:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
T
Tariq Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
T
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16
Thanks for your help gents.

I am going to the building site tomorrow and will check what possible placement options I can have. At this stage, I can add a conduit for the placement of speakers for both the height and width effects. If that is possible, then I will do that and then decide whether I would like to add the width or height.

Width make more sense to me because it is a long room and looks like it will benefit from the width aspect more.

I take the issue for the bookshelf versus surround. It makes sense and I will amend my initial plan accordingly.

However, the M2's will look puny next to the M80ti. So for cosmetic reasons, I will probably go with the M22 instead.

Will see.


Tariq

M80v2 - VP180 - S:QS8 - SB:QS8 - SWide:QS8
Denon 4311 + XPA-3
Sub: Dual SVS Ultra-13
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
2x6spds #334900 01/19/11 07:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I'll put my order in for 3008 and 2 M2's please. smile


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: 9.2 vs 7.2, any difference
grunt #334906 01/19/11 02:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Originally Posted By: grunt
Originally Posted By: 2x6spds
Most importantly, you get to buy 2 more speakers.

Axiom should give those 9.2-11.2 Onks away.


Bucking for a position on the customer council? wink

What customer council?

(That's only partially a joke.)

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 344 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4