Model Seeks to be Real-Life Barbie 
That's not a photoshopped body either. I'm just wondering a man's point of view...if you guys think this is hot. To me, she looks like some alien hybrid! VERY CREEPY!!!
Yeah, I find her proportionally a little odd. Not just her body, but as attractive as big eyes are, they look too big for her face.
She's too far into the uncanny valley. Ick!
Besides, until her head can be popped off easily, she'll only be a bad faximile of Barbie.
She doesn't look real. Not attractive.
Just get a Real Doll and be done with it.
Just get a Real Doll and be done with it.
I believe that would actually be less creepy.
I guess some DO prefer love dolls over humans!
This is HER, btw, NOT a doll! Really? Can you imagine making out with THAT?!
I find it very disturbing myself. Speaking of disturbing, I went to the restroom at a department store at the mall recently, and this slim but VERY muscular woman with a bikini top was standing in front of the mirror dabbing her fake golden orange tan with paper towels. She was gone by the time I left the restroom...thank goodness. A couple of other people saw her too because I could hear them talking about her. It would have been different if it was at some women's bodybuilding competition...but, it was Younkers!
Does not do a thing for me, too fake.
She is
way too digital.
I prefer women who are more
analog.
The modern standard of "beauty" is becoming fake, ugly and perverted from nature.
Give me real and natural beauty any day.
She DOES look pretty plastic in all the images....
That is just wrong!
She's not the droid I'm looking for.
I guess some DO prefer love dolls over humans!
This is HER, btw, NOT a doll! Really? Can you imagine making out with THAT?!
I find it very disturbing myself. Speaking of disturbing, I went to the restroom at a department store at the mall recently, and this slim but VERY muscular woman with a bikini top was standing in front of the mirror dabbing her fake golden orange tan with paper towels. She was gone by the time I left the restroom...thank goodness. A couple of other people saw her too because I could hear them talking about her. It would have been different if it was at some women's bodybuilding competition...but, it was Younkers!
this reminds me of the disguised alien in "Mars Attacks!" who infiltrated the White House in order to kill the president.
CREEPY! Where is JP when you need him? This girl needs some serious help.
She has the plastic look down!
The sad thing is, she's probably one of those women who started off quite attractive...
She can eat crackers in my bed.....
Creepy!
1st choice. Real woman
2nd choice. Cylon (not real, but not nearly as creepy)
3rd choice. Not her. I'd rather eat crackers in bed alone.
Bob. They never built 12 year olds like that in my day...
She looks horrible imo. Get some meat on them there bones, damn!
she needs some cushion for the pushen
Creepy. Definitely not attractive.
Someone needs to feed her a big mac!
What makes it really creepy is the blank stare and closed mouth just like a plastic doll.
Who needs J.P.?
I can call B.D.D. when I see it.
I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole... or a ten foot Ukrainian, either.
Bren R.
Where's the guy who's trying to be Ken so they can pose together?
This is definitely to the extreme, but when people say they want only real and natural, I'm skeptical. Some lucky few people have that natural beauty, but what percentage of women actually go without ANY makeup? Not that I'd be against that, but we're just so used to seeing women in makeup that I think it would be quite jarring if there was a day every year where every single woman avoided using any kind of makeup.
... Not that I'd be against that, but we're just so used to seeing women in makeup that I think it would be quite jarring if there was a day every year where every single woman avoided using any kind of makeup.
Yeah, I mean, look at men. No makeup at all. Paper bags for every one of 'em I say.
Well, except Bob. He looks pretty good in a dog medication collar.
... Not that I'd be against that, but we're just so used to seeing women in makeup that I think it would be quite jarring if there was a day every year where every single woman avoided using any kind of makeup.
Yeah, I mean, look at men. No makeup at all. Paper bags for every one of 'em I say.
Well, except Bob. He looks pretty good in a dog medication collar.
I'd argue that men are held to different standards. I'm not saying women wouldn't be attractive without makeup, simply that we've come to expect it, and there'd be some adjustment if they suddenly went without.
Seriously, I don't find women that wear a lot of makeup attractive. I much prefer someone who wears little or none.
So you find no actresses attractive?
I think there's a significant enough difference between little and no makeup. Yes, too much makeup and too skinny are easy to point out in the extremes, but where exactly do you draw the lines of what's appropriate?
On screen, yeah. In real life. Lots of makeup is ugly, I don't care how good looking the woman.
I still need you to define "lots."
The following woman won some contest in Britain as having the "most beautiful face" (saw it on Good Morning America today). They say that she doesn't wear hardly any makeup. Her name is Florence Colgate.
Here is a link to the article and video snippit from the show.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/lifestyle/2012/04/britains-most-beautiful-face-reveals-beauty-secrets/
I still need you to define "lots."
Why? I prefer women with no makeup. None. Nada.
A little lipstick and some eye liner is ok from time to time I guess.
Have you ever seen somebody who normally wears makeup without? I'm talking eye liner and the likes. Not pretty. Constantly wearing makeup is not good for the skin.
Nick. The girl in that picture is wearing lipstick, blush (under which there is probably a base, eye liner and eye shadow. That's already too much for me.
I still need you to define "lots."
Why? I prefer women with no makeup. None. Nada.
A little lipstick and some eye liner is ok from time to time I guess.
Fair enough. Now what about hairy legs and armpits? Ha ha.
I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole... or a ten foot Ukrainian, either.
Bren R.
She looks horrible imo. Get some meat on them there bones, damn!
+1
Where's the guy who's trying to be Ken so they can pose together?
The casting director for a Ken couldn't find just the right hair color on a eunuch. If she really wants to be Barbie, she'll have to have her vajayjay capped and her earring posts will have to go straight into her head. In this chick's case, I don't think there'd be much damage.
To me there seems to be two types of beauty these days. She falls into the first category which is all about "eye-catching". To me, that is not necessarily 'true' beauty. It's a commercialization of beauty.
Yes, I'll be honest, if she was walking on the other side of the street, she would make me turn my head. You can't argue that she is not eye catching. Our culture has moved us into that direction, like it or not.
However, if she passed me on my side of the street, I would have time to make the transition from eye catching to WTF???
I will take natural beauty any day. Leaving the plastic look aside for moment, her skinny abdomen compared to the rest of her in that last sideways shot is just plain disturbing. Forget Barbie, I think as a kid I had a stretch rubber doll of the taller alien from Close Encounters of the Third Kind that had similar proportions.
I forgot to add. The old Northern Pikes song provides her with the perfect theme song for any of her runway appearances.
She Ain't Pretty, She Just Looks That Way! An awesome song in it's day too. Glad this made me remember it. You can't go wrong with lyrics like this.....
She said take me home and I won't make a fuss.
I said sure, you got change for the bus?
To me there seems to be two types of beauty these days. She falls into the first category which is all about "eye-catching". To me, that is not necessarily 'true' beauty. It's a commercialization of beauty.
Murph, she is eye-catching------ like a fish hook. The same head turning would be afforded the elephant man, or Bobby Houston.
I'll defend the "no makeup" side of things.
I've dated three girls that wore no makeup on a daily basis, and they all were and still are extremely pretty... and look younger than their age.
I would speak on plastic surgery on body parts, but it's a family forum.
Let me just say:
Bren R.
I believe you meant
In the late 19th C, women had lower ribs removed for fashion.
Speaking in strictly proportional terms, she could have left her waist alone and had 42 DDD implants.
That just brings back bad memories... that's MEMORIES, not mamma-- never mind.
Bren R.
How successfully does one dodge those?
Well, first you have to move to Richland, WA. And then.......
::running, ducking::
She looks a little off, but I'd still motorboat her, cause I'm a motorboatin' sonofabitch; and give her a mustache ride, cause I like the expo....
Nick. The girl in that picture is wearing lipstick, blush (under which there is probably a base, eye liner and eye shadow. That's already too much for me.
Maybe in that picture, but she doesn't have many photos on the internet yet. She surprisingly looks really similar even without makeup. There was a photo and in the video they talk about it too that she has naturally rosy cheeks, and super clear complexion. Then "the media" gets involved and puts make-up on everyone for their photos.
How successfully does one dodge those?
You just check it off of your bucket list and don't respond to her texts.
Bren R.
Fair enough. Now what about hairy legs and armpits? Ha ha.
Are you kidding me? I
love hippie chicks.
Nowadays women actually
over shave! Not all women look good "shaved" (if you know what I mean
). I like variety, not the (unrealistic) standard of modern beauty. Fake boobs (ugh), fake tan, fake blonde hair, too skinny, plastic surgery for plastic people, etc, etc.
Kinda sad how society has a hatred for au natural women. Euro chicks (at least they use to) don't always shave their pits and are insanely hot.
Real men like real women. Artifice is fun and all, but when it comes down to it, we are all have to face reality sometime.
A natural woman is perfection already, all that make-up and hair styling does is accentuate what's (hopefully) already there.
Too many women fall for the typical (dumb) male ideal of beauty.
Now if the thread would have started with this picture of the same woman ..... would everyone feel the same?
Her eyes still look empty, but she is beautiful!
Her eyes still look empty, but she is beautiful!
Maybe it's just me, but I can't see those two things as mutually exculsive.
I like her. She is just being who she wants to be.
I like her. She is just being who she wants to be.
I read about her a couple of months ago (I think it was her), and it's a new thing, I think from Japan for the doll look, these kids, oh wait my folks hated my long hair in the 60/70s.
As far as the eyes go, I'm not willing to make a call on her as a person from a photo, or photos
Jeff
That picture had been on my mind at work today. There was something about her that seemed familiar, but I couldn't put my finger on it (ew). She's James Cameron's fupped fantasy, only she's not bluish.
Seemse odd to me.... we like beautiful art, music, buildings, cars, you name it ..... but when we get to women, it's a different story.
Sure most women don't look like what is presented, or do men... or the car I drive look like a 911T .....(neither does most art, buildings, cars)
It's the brass ring, the fantasy .. what we all won't have but keeps us trying, going on...........whether it's a woman , a car , a house, family, doing the best at our chosen profession.... It's who we are (or a lot of us)
Is it right? Correct? I don't know, but it seems to be how humans work … Going for control, the unobtainable, the alpha
If you go just for the woman part .. your a sexist, if you want a bigger house .... well you are just bettering yourself
Who ever figures this out wins or has a best seller
Jeff
It's only sexist if you can't remember her name when you're through and you ask that she leave before you wake up, I think.
It's only sexist of you can't remember her name when you're through and you ask that she leave before you wake up, I think.
I've got an antidote for that
But if when she needs to, she can't read them!
Yeah, I'm just waiting for Mary to come back and say how misogynistic we all are. As for me, I hate digging in my heels and talking about my preferences, because chances are, the woman I end up with isn't going to fit into any preconceived ideas I may have. I already know that because the most beautiful woman I know definitely didn't fit into any mental pictures I had. Her beauty came out after years of knowing her. Of course I'll gawk at women that I only know superficially or just happen by. As audiosavant says, variety is good, and what attracts me to one woman isn't necessarily going to attract me to another... unless it's gobs of money. In the end, the attraction goes much deeper, and the beauty that's going to keep you interested is going to stay fixed on that person no matter what's going on with their exterior. Or at least that's the hope. My real world experience is limited.
I agree that fake breasts have never been a turn-on for me. Too much make-up can be off-putting, but I'll admit I think it can look pretty great on the right woman. What I won't do is try to tell a woman that she should or should not wear make-up based on my personal preferences. Hopefully none of you are actually going down that road. Ha ha.
Okay, so none of us are as good at objectifying women as this guy:
Mission Impossible IV: Ghost Protocol Blu-ray Review
You guys don't give yourselves enough credit. You are excellent at objectification. Charles, that kind of modesty will not get you any.
And whoTF could write 5 paragrpahs about a Tom Cruise movie?
