Axiom Home Page
Posted By: MarkSJohnson So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 07:47 PM
...what's with the ads?
Posted By: Ajax Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 07:54 PM
What ads. I don't got no stinkin' ads.
Posted By: Ken.C Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 08:11 PM
He's mad, MAD, I tell you!

He should buy my patented Max's Madness Miracle Medicine. Only 5 easy payments of $15.99!

dLimited time offer. Shipping and handling $25/item
Posted By: exlabdriver Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 08:53 PM
Forum hacked by some model citizen??

TAM
Posted By: MarkSJohnson Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 10:53 PM
Posted By: MarkSJohnson Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 10:54 PM
(Firefox 14.0.1)
Posted By: fredk Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 11:12 PM
Sure, blame it on Firefox. You were the one who put your sig up for rent.
Posted By: dakkon Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/25/12 11:39 PM
I am getting periodic add's im using google chrome..
Posted By: Ajax Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 12:50 AM
I found that thread and had no ads. IE9.
Posted By: JohnK Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 01:09 AM
No ads; IE9. Or, they may figure it's useless to try Browns fans.
Posted By: fredk Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 01:32 AM
Originally Posted By: JohnK
No ads; IE9. Or, they may figure it's useless to try Browns fans.

if=lawyer
run noadds
endif
Posted By: Ajax Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 03:34 AM
Originally Posted By: JohnK
No ads; IE9. Or, they may figure it's useless to try Browns fans.


Yeah, The Browns do enough to try Browns fans. They don't need any help. frown
Posted By: MarkSJohnson Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 12:15 PM
I had them in ie9 also, but Amie says that it should be all set now.
Posted By: Ken.C Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/26/12 07:41 PM
Hunh, now I'm seeing them.
Posted By: pmbuko Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/27/12 02:28 AM
Weird. I never use protection and I still don't get them.


I must be immune to ADS.
Posted By: a401classic Re: So, ummmm..... - 08/27/12 10:50 AM
I wasn't seeing any at the start of this thread - and none in this thread that I can see, but now seeing ads in some of the other threads - like the tankless waterheater...

Running Safari 5.0.6
Posted By: Ray3 Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 12:47 AM
I have no ads, adds or ADS.

I do have on off- topic question though (HIJACK ALERT). Johnk and fredk share the same last name. Are they related?
Posted By: Murph Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 11:08 AM
Do you mean as in the same genome, same family tree or are we talking a full-on, dual identity conspiracy here??? I for one am in for the conspiracy play.
Posted By: medic8r Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 12:38 PM
They have never been seen in the same room, have they?

The plot thickens.
Posted By: Ray3 Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 04:21 PM
You both share my concerns and conclusions. Curious.
Posted By: fredk Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 04:40 PM
If we do turn out to be the same person, I call dibs on the better looking half.
Posted By: medic8r Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 05:19 PM
"I've got the looks, you've got the brains, let's make lots of money" - Pet Shop Boys, "Opportunities"
Posted By: pmbuko Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 05:30 PM
Originally Posted By: medic8r
The plot thickens.

So that's where my cornstarch went.
Posted By: Ken.C Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 05:35 PM
You should use arrowroot anyway. It's more flavorless.
Posted By: pmbuko Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/07/12 05:43 PM
But the cornstarch helps dial back the heat from the red peppers that I always overdo.
Posted By: tomtuttle Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/08/12 05:41 AM
"more flavorless" sounds funny.

Roux, baby. Only roux.
Posted By: a401classic Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/08/12 01:15 PM
Originally Posted By: tomtuttle
"more flavorless" sounds funny.

Roux, baby. Only roux.


A proper roux takes time. Of course, a good cookbook will guide you through the process.
Posted By: Amie Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/08/12 02:50 PM
+1 for Scott's cooking! If he says this is the best cookbook . . .
Posted By: a401classic Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/08/12 04:07 PM
I must confess that we do not own this cookbook, but I was aware of it and the tie in to roux was too convenient. Maybe if we had had this book we wouldn't have killed our first dark rouxs. White and blonde are easy. The darker rouxs take time and patience. A good dark roux take easily 45-60 minutes on a low flame to get it dark brown and nutty-tasting, without a burnt after taste.

p.s. thanks for the props on our cooking, Amie.
Posted By: spiffnme Re: So, ummmm..... - 09/10/12 04:16 PM
Chrome with AdBlock. I never see ads. smile
© Axiom Message Boards