My favorite is no.8, but I prefer to use Albert, Stephen and Richard cuz I feel that I actually know them.
And Yes, I have a gut level feeling about no. 30.
The primary fallicy that I find in all of this has to do with the date it was published and given to our peers.
Since 1998 I have made so many successfull thought experiments and created so many new theories to refute nearly all of the points, that the disertation has been rendered pointless!!
So THERE!
Prof Rich.
Actually, a person could have lots of fun with these points if they didn't have a bunch of kids buggin' them and ruinin' their concentration!
Uh oh, noticed something else I haden't noticed before:
These points take on a new, more sinister personality when read in reverse sequence. Maybe not something that PAM Dirac would argue, like billiard balls, but something sorta' counterintuitive.
Here's a clincher:
How does one pronounce "Unioninized"?