Axiom Home Page
Posted By: Bart m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 05:49 AM
These will be in a basement that is 12 x 25 with 7.5 ceillings. I will be running them from a Yamaha 6190b. The main use will be HT, and 2 channel audio will be the secondary use. I have an SVS sub, so bass should not be an issue. I know the m60 is 8ohm and the m80 is 4ohm. The 6190 supports both 8 and 4 ohm. Will I be losing anything other then a little bass by going with the m60 over the m80? Please recommend m60 0r m80. Price is not a big issue, but saving a few bucks never hurts. Thanks.
Posted By: Major Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 07:41 AM
i would just call Axioms 800 number. They recommended I get the M60's - driving them with a Sony 5300ES and my room is 13x19x10. Sound can knock the paint off the walls. They won't steer you wrong.
Posted By: jakewash Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 10:16 AM
It becomes a personal preference at this point I found the M60s vocals to take a back seat to the music ever so slightly directly compared to the M80s. Other than that and the slightly lower/smoother bass, they are almost identical. I would never go back to the M60 after hearing the M80s and now owning.
Posted By: Worfzara Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 01:00 PM
Your room is 2250 cubic feet, which is about average, you probaly don't need the extra power handeling of the M80's (unless you want to be deaf in less than a year?).

If you are using them only for HT I think you would love the M60's. A great speaker. If however you also want to listen to 2 channel music (no sub) I would go with the M80's. The extra bass extension of the 80's (which is suble but audable, doesn't require a sub (for most music) IMO and my listening room.

Both are excellent speakers and you'll probably keep them for life. It was a tough decision for me.

Paul
Posted By: SirQuack Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 01:32 PM
I've owned both and they are both great audiophile speakers. The 80's are the top of the line right now, and the 60's are very close. The 80's are a little more detailed and go a little lower. I think most people would be hard pressed to see much difference, unless they are playing at concert levels. \:\)

if you check the graphs for each on the product page you will see how similar performing they are in lab tests. My room is huge and I was totally happy with the 60's as well as my current 80's.




Posted By: a401classic Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/19/08 03:13 PM
You may enjoy reading this series as well...http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=177510#Post177510

If Mojo had done this before I got the 80's, I would have gone with the 60's. Am I sending the 80's back for a swap? Heck no.

Scott
Posted By: jakewash Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT. - 01/21/08 07:56 AM
 Originally Posted By: a401classic

If Mojo had done this before I got the 80's, I would have gone with the 60's. Am I sending the 80's back for a swap? Heck no.

Scott


Curious as to why you say you would have gone with the M60s?

It bothered me that there was a noticeable drop in vocals/upper FR from the M60s to my M22s which is what prompted me to get together with Mojo for a direct comparison of all the speakers we had.

I found the 60s to be nearly identical to the M80s once the volume is turned up closer to the one watt(85db+)but for the lower volumes the differences were noticeable.
© Axiom Message Boards