I thought LCoS was either delayed or just not happenning? I was checking out what Best Buy had online for TVs can came across this one.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=1083712380458&skuId=6337635&productCategoryId=pcmcat31800050028&type=product
Was I remembering incorrectly?
First time I tried to use the url link feature on here...apparently I did something wrong.
looks like what you did was used the = sign for the address, then closed the url before putting in a word. something like this: [url=http://blah.blah.org ][ /url] as opposed to something like this [url=http://blah.blah.org ]word[ /url]
The 1920x1080 LCoS sets are delayed. There's still a few lower rez LCoS sets out there.
I did [url] the text and the same thing in brackets with /url at the end
bizarre. Did you do it like this? [url ]http://www.here.com[ /url]
Intel announced delays on their new LCoS chips... real bummer cause it sounded like this tech was gonna take off and give DLP a real run for the money.
Competition is the good.
It worked....maybe I put in an extra space the first time.
So has anyone seen(or own) an LCoS set yet? How does it compare to DLP and some other newer technologies?
I saw a 50" LCOS at a BLOSE store around me. It looked terrible. Granted, they were running a non-progressive signal to the tv, and then they blew up the image to fill in the whoel screen (the movie was a 2.3:1 image, so they blew it up until it completely filled the 16:9 ration). I asked them to turn the zoom off, and they did, but the image was still funny looking - the image looked clear, but had a wierd "feel" to it. It didn't loko very film like.
Hopefully, this was a problem with the set-up and not the technology. I hear its going to be better and cheaper than DLP.
I saw a Phillips LCoS at a local retailer along side a Samsung DLP... With only looking at them for a short time I thought the LCoS looked very good, perhaps better.