Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Audiobytes Maximum Performance
#334917 01/19/11 04:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
M
Martin Offline OP
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
M
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
I'm a classical music lover and Audiobytes rival the sound of the very expensive system in my living room. Thanks to my computer I can listen to radio stations all over the world.It is now time for me to upgrade again. My computer guru strongly
favours Intel over AMD chips. In carefully reading the specs
I notice that most computer companies these days are favouring chipsets over soundcards. I seem to recall some folks saying the latter provide better performance.I would love to here from knowledgeable audiophiles.

Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
Martin #334920 01/19/11 04:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Welcome to the forum!

I know that my Sound FX external sound card returns a ruler flat response vs my on board sound chips in all 4 of my PC's and my laptop when I calibrated my REW software, so I say the card route would be the better way to go.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
Martin #334926 01/19/11 04:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Welcome Martin.

Onboard sound vs. soundcards - I believe this is a question of evolving history. The original on-board sound from some years ago used to be greatly inferior to having a dedicated sound card. Depending on your exact purposes and functionality needed, that gap is always being closed. I think today it is to the point where basic stereo (or surround even) playback likely doesn't need a dedicated sound card as long as you have good flat response, low THD on-board sound. However if you want to get into REW and other advanced uses then a dedicated card can definitely be worth it. Carefully evaluating the OB sound versus an add-on card for your specific purposes I think will give you your answer.


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
cb919 #334927 01/19/11 04:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
I'm to the point where I don't want a DAC inside the computer at all. Give me at minimum an optical out, but PCM over HDMI is perfect.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
ClubNeon #334947 01/19/11 07:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
I'm kind of with Chris on this. Just have the computer give you the digital output and convert it to analog outside the computer. I'm assuming the Audiobytes don't have a DAC.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
tomtuttle #334948 01/19/11 07:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Yeah, the Audiobytes don't have a DAC (how about that Axiom, a USB/optical DAC integrated into the Audiobytes amp?), so that makes the prospect of getting an external DAC a little less appealing. Those products are not priced for normal humans.

But a small receiver paired with M2s would be really nice (and probably still cost less than most stand-alone DACs).


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
ClubNeon #334966 01/19/11 08:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 1
Good point. I have never associated music played from a PC with 'serious listening'. That's my own quirk as I simply don't have a PC anywhere near my HT room to tap into - guess I'm behind the times on this one! blush

Great idea on a built in DAC for the Audiobytes.


Dan
On-Wall M5HP LCR, QS8 & EP500 in 7.1
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
cb919 #334977 01/19/11 09:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Okay, well, what about an external USB sound card, then? Is that a suitable compromise between "inside the PC" and "stupidly expensive external DAC"?


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
tomtuttle #334979 01/19/11 10:01 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I'd say it's pretty much the same thing as "stupidly expensive external DAC."


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Audiobytes Maximum Performance
tomtuttle #334980 01/19/11 10:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Yeah, there are some good ones around (but a lot of junk too).

It's hard to find something that does 24-bit/96 kHz over USB (that isn't built of diamonds and gold).

HRT http://www.highresolutiontechnologies.com/ does make several levels of USB, stereo DACs that start out at reasonable prices. Just a little hard to find dealers.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 565 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4