Hmm. One of our network guys is recommending it for the client I'm at right now (waiting for someone to show). I wonder what his response to that would be. He had a good reason when he explained it to me... Why would it be more visible to the outside world? The DMZ is just another port on the firewall. I don't see a way to hook up the wireless to anything without a switch or hub without putting it on a separate network, such as the DMZ. NAT is not really security, it is just obfuscation. However, the last line of yours sounds pretty good to me.
