Actually Jason, I think a lot of the hacking these days falls into two categories: Those who are highly organized and out to make money, those who like to play with toys easily available on the internet to cause mayham.
Either way, windoz makes a much more appealing target because there are so many poorly protected machines out there. Its a numbers game.
I did a bunch of reading on av software 6 months back and its hard to get a good read on what works and what doesn’t. Many of the tests have bias built into them.
Strangely, Norton is getting good marks, not just for detection rates, but also for the very low numbers of false positives.
