Doesn't it more completely say:
"In this Dolby vs DTS debate, DTS people argue that they are after 'sonic perfection, not space consumption' - hence the higher bit rate and lower compression.
Dolby would counteract that their codec is more efficient and therefore, it can operate at a lower bit rate. "
Higher bit rate and lower compression does not equal less efficient... However, who really knows which is actually true. Both companies want to "spin it" like a couple of competing politicians. Like the rest of the article states, there is more to it than bit rates and compression levels. I just know that I like the levels in which DTS remixes the soundtrack, and that is good enough for me.
Last edited by nickbuol; 02/01/09 06:23 AM.
